Literature DB >> 11421412

Deciding on treatment limitation for neonates: the parents' perspective.

H E McHaffie1, A J Lyon, R Hume.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The reported study aimed to explore parents' perceptions of treatment withdrawal/withholding; their experience and their opinions. In-depth face-to-face interviews at 3 and 13 months after the baby's death were conducted with 108 parents of 62 babies from the East of Scotland. Of the parents, 56% (60/180) believed they had decided to stop treatment. A further 4/59 sets of parents subsequently wished they had taken responsibility. Only one parent who did decide felt guilt 3 months after the event. Parents identified two essential factors which minimise doubt: full and honest information and concrete evidence of a poor prognosis.
CONCLUSION: The majority of parents wish to be active in decision making on behalf of their baby. Doing so does not appear to have adverse consequences. The pacing of events in the process of deciding and managing the dying is critical. Dissatisfaction is reduced if parents are given time and evidence to help them assimilate the reality at each stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11421412     DOI: 10.1007/pl00008444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  23 in total

1.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review.

Authors:  Kimberly A Allen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  The acceptability among lay persons and health professionals of actively ending the lives of damaged newborns.

Authors:  Nathalie Teisseyre; Charles Vanraet; Paul C Sorum; Etienne Mullet
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2010-09

4.  Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress?

Authors:  Trisha M Prentice; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 5.  What is known about parents' treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making.

Authors:  Ellen A Lipstein; William B Brinkman; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Parent Involvement in End-of-Life Care and Decision Making in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Lacey M Eden; Lynn Clark Callister
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

7.  Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period.

Authors:  Teresa T Moro; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa A Savage; Maria R Reyes; Robert E Kimura; Rama Bhat
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

8.  The BRACELET Study: surveys of mortality in UK neonatal and paediatric intensive care trials.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Sheila E Harvey; Peter Brocklehurst; Robert C Tasker; Martin P Ward Platt; Elizabeth Allen; Diana Elbourne
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  End-of-life experiences of nurses and physicians in the newborn intensive care unit.

Authors:  E G Epstein
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Neonatologist training to guide family decision making for critically ill infants.

Authors:  Renee D Boss; Nancy Hutton; Pamela K Donohue; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.