| Literature DB >> 33235053 |
Shahabe Saquib Abullais1, Nabeeh Abdullah Alqahtani1, Raed Mofarh Alkhulban2, Sarah Hassan Alamer3, Abdul Ahad Khan4, Sandeep Pimple5.
Abstract
Sutures are used for the approximation of incised flaps, assistance in primary healing, and hemorrhage control. In oral and periodontal surgery, the appropriate selection of suture material is vital for favorable healing.The aim of the present in-vitro experiment was to evaluate the tensile strengths of 4 different types of suture materials (silk, polygalactine 910, polypropylene, chromic catgut) by simulating potential short-term intraoral exposure to various beverages (saliva, Arabic coffee, tea, cola).A total of 280 suture specimens were prepared, out of which 10 specimens from each group were selected for pre-immersion testing. Remaining suture specimens were immersed in 4 different thermostatically controlled media (1 control [artificial saliva], 3 tests [Cola drink, Arabic coffee, Tea]). Tensile strength was measured at pre-immersion, 3, 7, and 14 days using a universal tensile testing machine. The maximum load required to break the suture material was recorded in Newton.At day 3, tea caused significant reduction in tensile strength of silk and cola caused significant reduction in tensile strengths of polygalactine 910 and chromic catgut. Whereas, at day 7, silk and polypropylene retained their tensile strengths better than others.The authors recommend precaution in the use of these beverages in the first postoperative week, to avoid adverse effect on the mechanical strength of sutures. When exposure to these beverages are anticipated, it is better to use polypropylene sutures that resists rapid fall in tensile strengths in the early postoperative period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33235053 PMCID: PMC7710252 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Details about the suture material used for the experiment.
| Suture material | Composition | Degradation | Manufacturer |
| Silk | Natural Braided | Non- Absorbable | Mersilk, Ethicon, J&J Pvt. Ltd. India. |
| Polyglactin 910 | Synthetic braided | Absorbable | Vicryl, Ethicon, J&J Pvt. Ltd. India. |
| Polypropylene | Synthetic Monofilament | Non- Absorbable | Prolene, Ethicon, J&J Pvt. Ltd. India. |
| Chromic catgut | Natural Monofilament | Absorbable | Mersutures, Ethicon, J&J Pvt. Ltd. India. |
Chemical composition of artificial saliva.
| Chemical components | Concentration (mg/L) |
| Sodium chloride | 125.6 |
| Potassium chloride | 963.9 |
| Potassium thiocyanate | 189.2 |
| Monopotassium phosphate | 654.5 |
| Uréa | 200.0 |
| Sodium sulfate decahydrate | 763.2 |
| Ammonium chloride | 178.0 |
| Calcium Chloride Dihydrate | 227.8 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 630.8 |
Figure 1Flowchart of the study design.
Figure 2Suture specimen mounted by using hooks between the crossheads of universal testing machine.
Intra-group comparison of tensile strength (mean ± SD) of suture materials from pre-immersion/baseline to 14 d in relation to different test media.
| Suture | Pre-immersion/baseline (NCT) | Media | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 |
| Silk (SL) | 10.60 ± 1.26 | Saliva (PCT) | 10.60 ± 0.55NS | 9.00 ± 1.00NS | 9.00 ± 0.71† |
| Cola (TT-1) | 10.80 ± 0.84NS | 9.40 ± 0.89NS | 8.80 ± 0.84∗ | ||
| Arabic Coffee (TT-2) | 9.00 ± 1.00NS | 8.40 ± 0.55∗ | 7.80 ± 0.84† | ||
| Tea ((TT-3) | 8.60 ± 0.55∗ | 8.40 ± 0.55∗ | 7.40 ± 1.14∗ | ||
| Polyglactin 910 (PG) | 14.50 ± 1.27 | Saliva (PCT) | 13.40 ± 0.89NS | 12.20 ± 1.30† | 12.60 ± 0.89NS |
| Cola (TT-1) | 10.80 ± 0.84† | 10.80 ± 0.84† | 9.00 ± 1.00† | ||
| Arabic Coffee (TT-2) | 12.80 ± 0.84NS | 12.00 ± 1.00∗ | 10.80 ± 1.48† | ||
| Tea ((TT-3) | 14.20 ± 1.64NS | 12.20 ± 0.84∗ | 10.80 ± 1.64∗ | ||
| Polypropylene (PP) | 20.40 ± 1.26 | Saliva (PCT) | 20.20 ± 1.30NS | 19.00 ± 1.00∗ | 16.20 ± 1.30‡ |
| Cola (TT-1) | 19.40 ± 1.14NS | 19.00 ± 1.58NS | 15.60 ± 1.14† | ||
| Arabic Coffee (TT-2) | 18.20 ± 0.84NS | 16.20 ± 0.84† | 14.20 ± 0.84† | ||
| Tea ((TT-3) | 19.80 ± 1.64NS | 18.40 ± 1.14∗ | 15.60 ± 1.14‡ | ||
| Chromic catgut (CC) | 8.60 ± 0.84 | Saliva (PCT) | 8.00 ± 0.71NS | 7.40 ± 0.52∗ | 7.20 ± 0.84∗ |
| Cola (TT-1) | 6.20 ± 0.84∗ | 5.40 ± 0.55† | 4.00 ± 1.00† | ||
| Arabic Coffee (TT-2) | 9.00 ± 0.71NS | 6.20 ± 0.84∗ | 5.40 ± 0.55† | ||
| Tea (TT-3) | 7.20 ± 0.84∗ | 5.80 ± 0.84† | 4.40 ± 0.89‡ |
Figure 3Change in tensile strength of tested suture materials over a period of 14 d after immersion in artificial saliva (positive control).
Figure 4Change in tensile strength of tested suture materials over a period of 14 d after immersion in cola (Test media 1).
Figure 5Change in tensile strength of tested suture materials over a period of 14 d after immersion in Arabic coffee (Test media 2).
Figure 6Change in tensile strength of tested suture materials over a period of 14 d after immersion in tea (Test media 3).
Inter-group comparison of mean strength at different time interval between control and test groups.
| Silk (SL) | Polyglactin 910 (PG) | Polypropylene (PP) | Catgut (CC) | |||||||||
| Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | |
| PCT v/s TTI | 0.025∗ | 0.999NS | 0.299NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.258NS | 0.142NS | 0.010† | 0.073NS | 0.348NS | 0.456NS | 0.022∗ |
| PCT v/s TT2 | 0.004† | 0.999NS | 0.073NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.258NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.012∗ | 0.134NS | 0.001‡ |
| PCT v/s TT3 | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.264NS | 0.003† | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.999NS | 0.012∗ | 0.036∗ | 0.001‡ |