OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, in well-functioning older adults, a lower score on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and slower gait are associated with greater risk of mortality and of developing incident disability independent of other risk factors, including brain structural abnormalities (white matter hyperintensities, brain infarcts, ventricular enlargement) and whether the combination of varying levels of DSST score and gait speed are associated with a greater risk of mortality and disability than low DSST or slow gait alone. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand one hundred fifty-six (43% men, 29% black, mean age 70.4) participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), free from stroke and physical disability and with a modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score of 80 or higher. MEASUREMENTS: Total mortality and incident disability (self-report of any difficulty performing one or more of the six activities of daily living) ascertained over a median follow-up time of 8.4 years. RESULTS: By the end of follow-up, 704 participants had died and 1,096 had incident disability. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cardiovascular disease, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, lower DSST score and slower gait remained significantly associated with greater risk of mortality and of incident disability. Mortality rates were higher in those who had both low DSST score (<27 points) and slow gait (speed <1.0 m/s) than in those who had only low DSST score, only slow gait, or neither (rates per 1,000 person years (p-y): 61.2, 42.8, 20.8, and 16.3, respectively). A similar risk gradient was observed for incident disability (82.0, 57.9, 47.9, and 36.0/1,000 p-y, respectively). CONCLUSION: In well-functioning older adults, low DSST score and slow gait, alone or in combination, could be risk factors for mortality and for developing disability, independent of other risk factors, including measures of brain integrity.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, in well-functioning older adults, a lower score on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and slower gait are associated with greater risk of mortality and of developing incident disability independent of other risk factors, including brain structural abnormalities (white matter hyperintensities, brain infarcts, ventricular enlargement) and whether the combination of varying levels of DSST score and gait speed are associated with a greater risk of mortality and disability than low DSST or slow gait alone. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand one hundred fifty-six (43% men, 29% black, mean age 70.4) participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), free from stroke and physical disability and with a modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score of 80 or higher. MEASUREMENTS: Total mortality and incident disability (self-report of any difficulty performing one or more of the six activities of daily living) ascertained over a median follow-up time of 8.4 years. RESULTS: By the end of follow-up, 704 participants had died and 1,096 had incident disability. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cardiovascular disease, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, lower DSST score and slower gait remained significantly associated with greater risk of mortality and of incident disability. Mortality rates were higher in those who had both low DSST score (<27 points) and slow gait (speed <1.0 m/s) than in those who had only low DSST score, only slow gait, or neither (rates per 1,000 person years (p-y): 61.2, 42.8, 20.8, and 16.3, respectively). A similar risk gradient was observed for incident disability (82.0, 57.9, 47.9, and 36.0/1,000 p-y, respectively). CONCLUSION: In well-functioning older adults, low DSST score and slow gait, alone or in combination, could be risk factors for mortality and for developing disability, independent of other risk factors, including measures of brain integrity.
Authors: A F Kramer; S Hahn; N J Cohen; M T Banich; E McAuley; C R Harrison; J Chason; E Vakil; L Bardell; R A Boileau; A Colcombe Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Subashan Perera; Stephanie Studenski; Julie M Chandler; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L H Kuller; L Shemanski; T Manolio; M Haan; L Fried; N Bryan; G L Burke; R Tracy; R Bhadelia Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: R N Bryan; S W Wells; T J Miller; A D Elster; C A Jungreis; V C Poirier; B K Lind; T A Manolio Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Valory N Pavlik; Suzana Alves de Moraes; Moyses Szklo; David S Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; David J Hyman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Stephanie A Studenski; Howard J Aizenstein; Robert M Boudreau; William T Longstreth; Anne B Newman Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Karen A Nunley; Howard Aizenstein; Tamara B Harris; Kristine Yaffe; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Karen A Nunley; Christopher M Ryan; Trevor J Orchard; Howard J Aizenstein; J Richard Jennings; John Ryan; Janice C Zgibor; Robert M Boudreau; Tina Costacou; John D Maynard; Rachel G Miller; Caterina Rosano Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mary E Tinetti; Gail McAvay; Sandy S Chang; Yuming Ning; Anne B Newman; Annette Fitzpatrick; Terri R Fried; Tamara B Harris; Michael C Nevitt; Suzanne Satterfield; Kristine Yaffe; Peter Peduzzi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Sue E Leurgans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Vijay K Venkatraman; Jack Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Nancy W Glynn; Lenore Launer; Christopher A Taylor; Jeff Williamson; Stephanie Studenski; Marco Pahor; Howard Aizenstein Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 6.053