Literature DB >> 21964715

Fertility outcome analysis after modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.

Jihui Ai1, Pei Zhang, Lei Jin, Yufeng Li, Jing Yue, Ding Ma, Hanwang Zhang.   

Abstract

Modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis is an alternative for microsurgical anastomosis via laparotomy to reverse sterilization in women with renewed child wish. The current study aims to evaluate the fertility outcome after modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. A retrospective study was performed. Fifty-eight women who underwent modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis were monitored to investigate the fertility outcome and characteristics of this new technology. Of the 58 patients, the cumulative pregnancy rate (PR) in the 42 patients with follow-up data was 23.8% (10/42), 57.1% (24/42), 66.7% (28/42), and 73.8% (31/42) within 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, respectively. The intrauterine PR was 69.0% (29/42). Two patients (4.8%) had ectopic pregnancies that occurred within 24 months of surgery; three cases ended in spontaneous abortion. The delivery rate was 83.9% (26/31). The length of operating time was 1.2±0.3 h, with a range of 1.0-2.5 h (60-145 min), and the mean time was approximately 75 min. The blood loss was relatively small, between 10 and 50 ml with an average amount of 22 ml. Thus, the modified laparoscopic tubal anastomosis is a highly successful procedure and a viable alternative to open abdominal microsurgical approaches. Compared with the traditional laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal, this modified approach has three advantages: (1) less invasive approach via a trocar reduction; (2) remodeling of tube is better performing tied together after 3-4 sutures; and (3) faster operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964715     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-011-0152-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  11 in total

1.  Fertility outcomes following laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis post tubal sterilisation.

Authors:  Philip Kaloo; Michael Cooper
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases.

Authors:  T K Yoon; H R Sung; H G Kang; S H Cha; C N Lee; K Y Cha
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Single suture laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis.

Authors:  J B Dubuisson; C Chapron
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors from tubal sterilization reversal by sutureless laparoscopical re-anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Janneke J B F G Schepens; Ben W J Mol; Maarten A H M Wiegerinck; Saskia Houterman; Carolien A M Koks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study.

Authors:  T Falcone; J M Goldberg; H Margossian; L Stevens
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1,118 cases.

Authors:  S H Kim; C J Shin; J G Kim; S Y Moon; J Y Lee; Y S Chang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.

Authors:  T K Yoon; H R Sung; S H Cha; C N Lee; K Y Cha
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Microsurgical reversal of sterilisation - is this still clinically relevant today?

Authors:  Heng Hao Tan; Seong Feei Loh
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.473

9.  Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis.

Authors:  S C Ribeiro; R A Tormena; C G Giribela; C R Izzo; N C Santos; J A Pinotti
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Sejal P Dharia Patel; Michael P Steinkampf; Scott J Whitten; Beth A Malizia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre.

Authors:  Rana Karayalcin; Sarp Ozcan; Aytekin Tokmak; Beril Gürlek; Okan Yenicesu; Hakan Timur
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.