Literature DB >> 10785235

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study.

T Falcone1, J M Goldberg, H Margossian, L Stevens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a robotic device to perform a laparoscopic tubal anastomosis.
DESIGN: Prospective pilot study.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENT(S): Ten patients with previous tubal ligations underwent laparoscopic tubal ligation reversal using a robotic suturing device. INTERVENTION(S): Tubal surgery was performed with a robotic system. A two-layered closure was used for all tubes. Four stitches of 8-0 polygalactin sutures were used for each layer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Tubal patency; secondary measures were pregnancy rates, complications, and operative time. RESULT(S): The procedure was completed successfully in all 10 patients. No patient required conversion to an open procedure. The mean time (+/-SD) required to complete the anastomosis of both tubes was 159 +/- 33.8 minutes. Chromotubation at the end of the procedure showed patency in all tubes anastomosed. A postoperative hysterosalpingogram 6 weeks after surgery demonstrated patency in 17 of the 19 (89%) tubes anastomosed. There have been five pregnancies so far. There were no complications. CONCLUSION(S): Robotic technology can be used safely to create laparoscopic microsurgical anastomoses with adequate patency rates. Robotic technology has the potential to make laparoscopic microsuturing easier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10785235     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00423-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  31 in total

1.  Robotic assisted microsurgical vasal reconstruction in a model system.

Authors:  Richard A Schoor; Lawrence Ross; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.

Authors:  G Hubens; H Coveliers; L Balliu; M Ruppert; W Vaneerdeweg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotics in pediatric surgery: perspectives for imaging.

Authors:  Adrien J Kant; Michael D Klein; Scott E Langenburg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-02-18

7.  Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Jayson B Field; Michelle F Benoit; Tri A Dinh; Concepcion Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic applications in reproductive endocrinology and infertility.

Authors:  Julie Sroga; Sejal Dharia Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-02-28

9.  A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyu-Seog Choi; In Ja Park; Byung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Experience of laparoscopic tubal surgery at the department of obstetrics and gynecology, University of Kiel, from 1999 through 2000.

Authors:  Thoralf Schollmeyer; Y Talab; Enrique Lehmann-Willenbrock; L Mettler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.