Literature DB >> 8986677

Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.

T K Yoon1, H R Sung, S H Cha, C N Lee, K Y Cha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
SETTING: Infertility Medical Center affiliated with University Medical School. PATIENT(S): Fifty-four patients, who had previously undergone tubal sterilization, seeking reversal. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy success was assessed. RESULT(S): The overall pregnancy rate (PR) was 77.5% (38/49) and 29 patients already have delivered healthy offspring. Pregnancy in seven patients is ongoing and one case ended in abortion. There was one case of ectopic pregnancy. The pregnancy success according to the method of previous tubal sterilization was 16 of 24 with the Fallope-ring method, 14 of 15 in cases of cauterization, and 8 of 10 in patients in whom the Pomeroy technique was used. The pregnancy success according to the site of anastomosis was 3 of 4 in cornual-isthmic, 4 of 5 in isthmic-isthmic, 26 of 35 in isthmic-ampulla, 3 of 3 in cornual-ampulla, and 2 of 2 in ampulla-ampulla. The pregnancy success according to the tubal length was 5 of 7 at a length < or = 4 cm, 3 of 5 at 5 cm, 15 of 17 at 6 cm, and 15 of 20 at lengths > or = 7 cm. CONCLUSION(S): Considering the high PR in our minimal follow-up period of 12 months, laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis could be an alternative procedure to microsurgical laparotomy in patients requesting reversal of tubal sterilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8986677     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81849-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation.

Authors:  Lauren B Messinger; Connie E Alford; John M Csokmay; Melinda B Henne; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Fertility outcome analysis after modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.

Authors:  Jihui Ai; Pei Zhang; Lei Jin; Yufeng Li; Jing Yue; Ding Ma; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Robotic tubal anastomosis: technical aspects.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bedaiwy; Ehab M Barakat; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Robot-assisted segmental resection of tubal pregnancy followed by end-to-end reanastomosis for preserving tubal patency and fertility: An initial report.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Park; SiHyun Cho; Young Sik Choi; Seok Kyo Seo; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre.

Authors:  Rana Karayalcin; Sarp Ozcan; Aytekin Tokmak; Beril Gürlek; Okan Yenicesu; Hakan Timur
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.