Literature DB >> 21964524

Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil.

Manuel Murbach1, Eugenia Cabot, Esra Neufeld, Marie-Christine Gosselin, Andreas Christ, Klaas P Pruessmann, Niels Kuster.   

Abstract

Usage of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is continuously increasing due to its excellent soft-tissue contrast and improving diagnostic values. MRI also has the advantage that it operates without ionizing radiation. The main safety concerns are torque, acceleration by the static field, nerve stimulation by the gradient fields, and tissue heating by the radio-frequency (RF) fields. This paper investigates if children and fetuses are at higher risks than adults when the current RF regulations are applied. We analyzed and compared local absorption hotspots, i.e., the peak spatial specific absorption rate averaged over any 10 g (psSAR10g) for five adults, three children of ages 5, 11 and 14 years, and 1 pregnant female (36 weeks' gestation) in 10 different Z-positions (head to calves). In the First Level Operating Mode (4 W/kg whole-body averaged exposure), the psSAR10g values found for adults were as large as 60 W/kg in the trunk and 104 W/kg in the extremities. The corresponding values for children were 43 and 58 W/kg, respectively, and 14 W/kg for the unborn child. Modeling of worst case anatomical RF loops can substantially increase the psSAR10g values, i.e., by factor >>2. The results suggest that local exposure for children and fetuses is smaller than for adults (15-75%), i.e., no special considerations for children and the unborn child are needed regarding psSAR10g due to RF. However, the local thermal load of the unborn may be significantly increased due to the high exposure average (up to 4 W/kg) of the non-perfused amniotic fluid.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964524     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  13 in total

1.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Gonzalo G Mendoza; Tom Lloyd; Maria Ida Iacono; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

Review 3.  Image-quality optimization and artifact reduction in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fedel Machado-Rivas; Camilo Jaimes; John E Kirsch; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  Brain Tissue Conductivity Measurements with MR-Electrical Properties Tomography: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Stefano Mandija; Petar I Petrov; Jord J T Vink; Sebastian F W Neggers; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages.

Authors:  Manuel Murbach; Esra Neufeld; Theodoros Samaras; Juan Córcoles; Fraser J Robb; Wolfgang Kainz; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Specific absorption rate implications of within-scan patient head motion for ultra-high field MRI.

Authors:  Emre Kopanoglu; Cem M Deniz; M Arcan Erturk; Richard G Wise
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The effect of simulation strategies on prediction of power deposition in the tissue around electronic implants during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bach T Nguyen; Julie Pilitsis; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels?

Authors:  Gerard C van Rhoon; Theodoros Samaras; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Mark W Dewhirst; Esra Neufeld; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment.

Authors:  Bu S Park; Amir Razjouyan; Leonardo M Angelone; Brent McCright; Sunder S Rajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.006

10.  Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Filiz Yetisir; Esra Abaci Turk; Bastien Guerin; Borjan A Gagoski; P Ellen Grant; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.