Literature DB >> 34240759

Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.

Filiz Yetisir1, Esra Abaci Turk1,2, Bastien Guerin3,4, Borjan A Gagoski1,4, P Ellen Grant1,2,4, Elfar Adalsteinsson5,6,7, Lawrence L Wald3,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigates whether two-channel radiofrequency (RF) shimming can improve imaging without increasing specific absorption rate (SAR) for fetal MRI at 3T.
METHODS: Transmit field ( B 1 + ) average and variation in the fetus was simulated in seven numerical pregnant body models. Safety was quantified by maternal and fetal peak local SAR and fetal average SAR. The shim parameter space was divided into improved B 1 + (magnitude and homogeneity) and improved SAR regions, and an overlap where RF shimming improved both classes of metrics compared with birdcage mode was assessed. Additionally, the effect of fetal position, tissue detail, and dielectric properties on transmit field and SAR was studied.
RESULTS: A region of subject-specific RF shim parameter space improving both B 1 + and SAR metrics was found for five of the seven models. Optimizing only B 1 + metrics improved B 1 + efficiency across models by 15% on average and 28% for the best-case model. B 1 + variation improved by 26% on average and 49% for the best case. However, for these shim settings, fetal SAR increased by up to 106%. The overlap region, where both B 1 + and SAR metrics improve, showed an average B 1 + efficiency improvement of 6% on average across models and 19% for the best-case model. B 1 + variation improved by 13% on average and 40% for the best case. RFS could also decrease maternal/fetal SAR by up to 49%/58%.
CONCLUSION: RF shimming can improve imaging compared with birdcage mode without increasing fetal and maternal SAR when a patient-specific SAR model is incorporated into the shimming procedure.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); parallel transmission (pTx); pregnant body models; radiofrequency (RF) shimming; radiofrequency safety

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34240759      PMCID: PMC8530882          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  29 in total

1.  Comparison Between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI for Fetal Imaging: Is There an Advantage to Imaging With a Higher Field Strength?

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Ann M Johnson; J Christopher Edgar; Deborah M Zarnow; Arastoo Vossough; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Clinical applications of dual-channel transmit MRI: A review.

Authors:  Wyger M Brink; Vikas Gulani; Andrew G Webb
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Virtual population-based assessment of the impact of 3 Tesla radiofrequency shimming and thermoregulation on safety and B1 + uniformity.

Authors:  Manuel Murbach; Esra Neufeld; Eugenia Cabot; Earl Zastrow; Juan Córcoles; Wolfgang Kainz; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Denise Pugash; Peter C Brugger; Dieter Bettelheim; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz.

Authors:  S Gabriel; R W Lau; C Gabriel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuyuki Saito; Masaharu Takahashi; Koichi Ito
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil.

Authors:  Manuel Murbach; Eugenia Cabot; Esra Neufeld; Marie-Christine Gosselin; Andreas Christ; Klaas P Pruessmann; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  RF-EMF exposure of fetus and mother during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Pediaditis; N Leitgeb; R Cech
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A deep learning method for image-based subject-specific local SAR assessment.

Authors:  E F Meliadò; A J E Raaijmakers; A Sbrizzi; B R Steensma; M Maspero; M H F Savenije; P R Luijten; C A T van den Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Individualized SAR calculations using computer vision-based MR segmentation and a fast electromagnetic solver.

Authors:  Eugene Milshteyn; Georgy Guryev; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Jacob K White; Lawrence L Wald; Bastien Guerin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.