OBJECTIVE: To define thresholds of safe local temperature increases for MR equipment that exposes patients to radiofrequency fields of high intensities for long duration. These MR systems induce heterogeneous energy absorption patterns inside the body and can create localised hotspots with a risk of overheating. METHODS: The MRI + EUREKA research consortium organised a "Thermal Workshop on RF Hotspots". The available literature on thresholds for thermal damage and the validity of the thermal dose (TD) model were discussed. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: The following global TD threshold guidelines for safe use of MR are proposed: 1. All persons: maximum local temperature of any tissue limited to 39 °C 2. Persons with compromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: maximum local temperature limited to 39 °C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C 3. Persons with uncompromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 9 CEM43°C The following definitions are applied: Controlled conditions A medical doctor or a dedicated trained person can respond instantly to heat-induced physiological stress Compromised thermoregulation All persons with impaired systemic or reduced local thermoregulation KEY POINTS: • Standard MRI can cause local heating by radiofrequency absorption. • Monitoring thermal dose (in units of CEM43°C) can control risk during MRI. • 9 CEM43°C seems an acceptable thermal dose threshold for most patients. • For skin, muscle, fat and bone,16 CEM43°C is likely acceptable.
OBJECTIVE: To define thresholds of safe local temperature increases for MR equipment that exposes patients to radiofrequency fields of high intensities for long duration. These MR systems induce heterogeneous energy absorption patterns inside the body and can create localised hotspots with a risk of overheating. METHODS: The MRI + EUREKA research consortium organised a "Thermal Workshop on RF Hotspots". The available literature on thresholds for thermal damage and the validity of the thermal dose (TD) model were discussed. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: The following global TD threshold guidelines for safe use of MR are proposed: 1. All persons: maximum local temperature of any tissue limited to 39 °C 2. Persons with compromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: maximum local temperature limited to 39 °C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C 3. Persons with uncompromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 9 CEM43°C The following definitions are applied: Controlled conditions A medical doctor or a dedicated trained person can respond instantly to heat-induced physiological stress Compromised thermoregulation All persons with impaired systemic or reduced local thermoregulation KEY POINTS: • Standard MRI can cause local heating by radiofrequency absorption. • Monitoring thermal dose (in units of CEM43°C) can control risk during MRI. • 9 CEM43°C seems an acceptable thermal dose threshold for most patients. • For skin, muscle, fat and bone,16 CEM43°C is likely acceptable.
Authors: Hansjörg Rempp; Rüdiger Hoffmann; Jörg Roland; Alexandra Buck; Antje Kickhefel; Claus D Claussen; Philippe L Pereira; Fritz Schick; Stephan Clasen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Edwin van der Wal; Martine Franckena; Dennis H M Wielheesen; Jacoba van der Zee; Gerard C van Rhoon Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Johannes B Erhardt; Thomas Lottner; Jessica Martinez; Ali C Özen; Martin Schuettler; Thomas Stieglitz; Daniel B Ennis; Michael Bock Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Niravkumar A Patel; Christopher J Nycz; Paulo A Carvalho; Katie Y Gandomi; Radian Gondokaryono; Gang Li; Tamas Heffter; Everette Clif Burdette; Julie G Pilitsis; Gregory S Fischer Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Zhi Wei Tay; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Andreina Chiu-Lam; Daniel W Hensley; Rohan Dhavalikar; Xinyi Y Zhou; Elaine Y Yu; Patrick W Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven M Conolly Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Brian P Mead; Colleen T Curley; Namho Kim; Karina Negron; William J Garrison; Ji Song; Divya Rao; G Wilson Miller; James W Mandell; Benjamin W Purow; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price Journal: Small Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Preethi B Balakrishnan; Elizabeth E Sweeney; Anvitha S Ramanujam; Rohan Fernandes Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.914