Literature DB >> 21963484

Engineering topology and kinetics of sucrose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield.

Thiago O Basso1, Stefan de Kok, Marcelo Dario, Júlio Cézar A do Espirito-Santo, Gabriela Müller, Paulo S Schlölg, Carlos P Silva, Aldo Tonso, Jean-Marc Daran, Andreas K Gombert, Antonius J A van Maris, Jack T Pronk, Boris U Stambuk.   

Abstract

Sucrose is a major carbon source for industrial bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In yeasts, two modes of sucrose metabolism occur: (i) extracellular hydrolysis by invertase, followed by uptake and metabolism of glucose and fructose, and (ii) uptake via sucrose-proton symport followed by intracellular hydrolysis and metabolism. Although alternative start codons in the SUC2 gene enable synthesis of extracellular and intracellular invertase isoforms, sucrose hydrolysis in S. cerevisiae predominantly occurs extracellularly. In anaerobic cultures, intracellular hydrolysis theoretically enables a 9% higher ethanol yield than extracellular hydrolysis, due to energy costs of sucrose-proton symport. This prediction was tested by engineering the promoter and 5' coding sequences of SUC2, resulting in predominant (94%) cytosolic localization of invertase. In anaerobic sucrose-limited chemostats, this iSUC2-strain showed an only 4% increased ethanol yield and high residual sucrose concentrations indicated suboptimal sucrose-transport kinetics. To improve sucrose-uptake affinity, it was subjected to 90 generations of laboratory evolution in anaerobic, sucrose-limited chemostat cultivation, resulting in a 20-fold decrease of residual sucrose concentrations and a 10-fold increase of the sucrose-transport capacity. A single-cell isolate showed an 11% higher ethanol yield on sucrose in chemostat cultures than an isogenic SUC2 reference strain, while transcriptome analysis revealed elevated expression of AGT1, encoding a disaccharide-proton symporter, and other maltose-related genes. After deletion of both copies of the duplicated AGT1, growth characteristics reverted to that of the unevolved SUC2 and iSUC2 strains. This study demonstrates that engineering the topology of sucrose metabolism is an attractive strategy to improve ethanol yields in industrial processes. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963484     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Eng        ISSN: 1096-7176            Impact factor:   9.783


  22 in total

Review 1.  The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Michael J Salazar; Liam L Weng; Bernhard O Palsson; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.783

2.  Controlling heterologous gene expression in yeast cell factories on different carbon substrates and across the diauxic shift: a comparison of yeast promoter activities.

Authors:  Bingyin Peng; Thomas C Williams; Matthew Henry; Lars K Nielsen; Claudia E Vickers
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.328

3.  Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1.

Authors:  Farbod Babrzadeh; Roxana Jalili; Chunlin Wang; Shadi Shokralla; Sarah Pierce; Avi Robinson-Mosher; Pål Nyren; Robert W Shafer; Luiz C Basso; Henrique V de Amorim; Antonio J de Oliveira; Ronald W Davis; Mostafa Ronaghi; Baback Gharizadeh; Boris U Stambuk
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 4.  Genome-wide analytical approaches for reverse metabolic engineering of industrially relevant phenotypes in yeast.

Authors:  Bart Oud; Antonius J A van Maris; Jean-Marc Daran; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Dynamic regulation of gene expression using sucrose responsive promoters and RNA interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Thomas C Williams; Monica I Espinosa; Lars K Nielsen; Claudia E Vickers
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Evolutionary Engineering in Chemostat Cultures for Improved Maltotriose Fermentation Kinetics in Saccharomyces pastorianus Lager Brewing Yeast.

Authors:  Anja Brickwedde; Marcel van den Broek; Jan-Maarten A Geertman; Frederico Magalhães; Niels G A Kuijpers; Brian Gibson; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc G Daran
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Elimination of sucrose transport and hydrolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a platform strain for engineering sucrose metabolism.

Authors:  Wesley Leoricy Marques; Robert Mans; Eko Roy Marella; Rosa Lorizolla Cordeiro; Marcel van den Broek; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Andreas K Gombert; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Converting Sugars to Biofuels: Ethanol and Beyond.

Authors:  Aram Kang; Taek Soon Lee
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-27

9.  Carbon dioxide fixation by Calvin-Cycle enzymes improves ethanol yield in yeast.

Authors:  Víctor Guadalupe-Medina; H Wouter Wisselink; Marijke Ah Luttik; Erik de Hulster; Jean-Marc Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius Ja van Maris
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Industrial antifoam agents impair ethanol fermentation and induce stress responses in yeast cells.

Authors:  Jens Christian Nielsen; Felipe Senne de Oliveira Lino; Thomas Gundelund Rasmussen; Jette Thykær; Christopher T Workman; Thiago Olitta Basso
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.