Literature DB >> 26112740

Controlling heterologous gene expression in yeast cell factories on different carbon substrates and across the diauxic shift: a comparison of yeast promoter activities.

Bingyin Peng1, Thomas C Williams2, Matthew Henry3, Lars K Nielsen4, Claudia E Vickers5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictable control of gene expression is necessary for the rational design and optimization of cell factories. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the promoter is one of the most important tools available for controlling gene expression. However, the complex expression patterns of yeast promoters have not been fully characterised and compared on different carbon sources (glucose, sucrose, galactose and ethanol) and across the diauxic shift in glucose batch cultivation. These conditions are of importance to yeast cell factory design because they are commonly used and encountered in industrial processes. Here, the activities of a series of "constitutive" and inducible promoters were characterised in single cells throughout the fermentation using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter.
RESULTS: The "constitutive" promoters, including glycolytic promoters, transcription elongation factor promoters and ribosomal promoters, differed in their response patterns to different carbon sources; however, in glucose batch cultivation, expression driven by these promoters decreased sharply as glucose was depleted and cells moved towards the diauxic shift. Promoters induced at low-glucose levels (P(HXT7), P(SSA1) and P(ADH2)) varied in induction strength on non-glucose carbon sources (sucrose, galactose and ethanol); in contrast to the "constitutive" promoters, GFP expression increased as glucose decreased and cells moved towards the diauxic shift. While lower than several "constitutive" promoters during the exponential phase, expression from the SSA1 promoter was higher in the post-diauxic phase than the commonly-used TEF1 promoter. The galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter provided the highest GFP expression on galactose, and the copper-inducible CUP1 promoter provided the highest induced GFP expression following the diauxic shift.
CONCLUSIONS: The data provides a foundation for predictable and optimised control of gene expression levels on different carbon sources and throughout batch fermentation, including during and after the diauxic shift. This information can be applied for designing expression approaches to improve yields, rates and titres in yeast cell factories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112740      PMCID: PMC4480987          DOI: 10.1186/s12934-015-0278-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Cell Fact        ISSN: 1475-2859            Impact factor:   5.328


  48 in total

1.  Improvement of xylose fermentation in respiratory-deficient xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bingyin Peng; Yu Shen; Xiaowei Li; Xiao Chen; Jin Hou; Xiaoming Bao
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 9.783

2.  A novel cis-acting element, ESP, contributes to high-level endosperm-specific expression in an oat globulin promoter.

Authors:  Claudia E Vickers; Gangping Xue; Peter M Gresshoff
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Towards quantitative metabolomics of mammalian cells: development of a metabolite extraction protocol.

Authors:  Stefanie Dietmair; Nicholas E Timmins; Peter P Gray; Lars K Nielsen; Jens O Krömer
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Engineering topology and kinetics of sucrose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield.

Authors:  Thiago O Basso; Stefan de Kok; Marcelo Dario; Júlio Cézar A do Espirito-Santo; Gabriela Müller; Paulo S Schlölg; Carlos P Silva; Aldo Tonso; Jean-Marc Daran; Andreas K Gombert; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk; Boris U Stambuk
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.783

5.  GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains negative control elements in addition to functionally separate and possibly overlapping upstream activating sequences.

Authors:  R W West; S M Chen; H Putz; G Butler; M Banerjee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Sudden depletion of carbon source blocks translation, but not transcription, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M T Martínez-Pastor; F Estruch
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-07-29       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Evidence for Cu(II) reduction as a component of copper uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Hassett; D J Kosman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae heat shock transcription factor under glucose starvation conditions by Snf1 protein kinase.

Authors:  Ji-Sook Hahn; Dennis J Thiele
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The genome sequence of E. coli W (ATCC 9637): comparative genome analysis and an improved genome-scale reconstruction of E. coli.

Authors:  Colin T Archer; Jihyun F Kim; Haeyoung Jeong; Jin Hwan Park; Claudia E Vickers; Sang Yup Lee; Lars K Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control.

Authors:  Robbie Loewith; Michael N Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  41 in total

1.  Increased copper bioremediation ability of new transgenic and adapted Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Polina Geva; Rotem Kahta; Faina Nakonechny; Stella Aronov; Marina Nisnevitch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Induction and relocalization of telomeric repeat-containing RNAs during diauxic shift in budding yeast.

Authors:  Carmina Angelica Perez-Romero; Maxime Lalonde; Pascal Chartrand; Emilio Cusanelli
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Engineering the biocatalytic selectivity of iridoid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  John M Billingsley; Anthony B DeNicola; Joyann S Barber; Man-Cheng Tang; Joe Horecka; Angela Chu; Neil K Garg; Yi Tang
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 9.783

4.  High-Titer Production of the Fungal Anhydrotetracycline, TAN-1612, in Engineered Yeasts.

Authors:  Pedro A Baldera-Aguayo; Arden Lee; Virginia W Cornish
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Engineered Production of Strictosidine and Analogues in Yeast.

Authors:  Joshua Misa; John M Billingsley; Kanji Niwa; Rachel K Yu; Yi Tang
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  A Tunable and Expandable Transactivation System in Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces boulardii.

Authors:  Suryang Kwak; Bejan Mahmud; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Heterologous Host for Natural Products.

Authors:  Maximilian Otto; Dany Liu; Verena Siewers
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Replacement of the initial steps of ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ATP-independent acetylating acetaldehyde dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Barbara U Kozak; Harmen M van Rossum; Matthijs S Niemeijer; Marlous van Dijk; Kirsten Benjamin; Liang Wu; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Engineered Biosensors from Dimeric Ligand-Binding Domains.

Authors:  Benjamin W Jester; Christine E Tinberg; Matthew S Rich; David Baker; Stanley Fields
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.110

10.  Huntingtin Polyglutamine Fragments Are a Substrate for Hsp104 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nicole J Wayne; Katherine E Dembny; Tyler Pease; Farrin Saba; Xiaohong Zhao; Daniel C Masison; Lois E Greene
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.