| Literature DB >> 21961933 |
Pascal L Zaffarano1, Valentin Queloz, Angelo Duò, Christoph R Grünig.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fungi are asexually and sexually reproducing organisms that can combine the evolutionary advantages of the two reproductive modes. However, for many fungi the sexual cycle has never been observed in the field or in vitro and it remains unclear whether sexual reproduction is absent or cryptic. Nevertheless, there are indirect approaches to assess the occurrence of sex in a species, such as population studies, expression analysis of genes involved in mating processes and analysis of their selective constraints. The members of the Phialocephala fortinii s. l. - Acephala applanata species complex (PAC) are ascomycetes and the predominant dark septate endophytes that colonize woody plant roots. Despite their abundance in many ecosystems of the northern hemisphere, no sexual state has been identified to date and little is known about their reproductive biology, and how it shaped their evolutionary history and contributes to their ecological role in forest ecosystems. We therefore aimed at assessing the importance of sexual reproduction by indirect approaches that included molecular analyses of the mating type (MAT) genes involved in reproductive processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21961933 PMCID: PMC3199270 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Example of multiplex PCR. Multiplex PCR amplification of idiomorph specific bands in selected strains of different PAC species, using the primers Pf_HMG_R.03, Pf_HMG_F4 and Pf_MAT1-1F1c.
Strains for which the complete mating type idiomorph was sequenced
| Species | Strain | Idiomorph | Geographic origin | Host/Substrate1 | Reference/Collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1_120_2 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 1_117_3 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 2_120_3 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 2_116_2 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 3_136_1 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 3_122_3 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 4_140_4 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 4_153_2 | Zürichberg, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 5_265_3 | Uetliberg; Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 5_265_4 | Uetliberg; Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 6_30_4 | Bödmeren, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 6_37_6v | Bödmeren, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 7_K93_444a | Suonenjoki, Finland | roots of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| 7_6_7v | Bödmeren, Switzerland | root of | Zaffarano et al. (2010) | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP8 | 8_L_05-7 | Sheep Creek, USA | n.a. | J.B. Zaerr | [GenBank: | |
| 8_L_02-5 | Sheep Creek, USA | n.a. | J.B. Zaerr | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP9 | 9_ST_43-1 | Walder Steinenberg, Switzerland | root of | N. Brenn | [GenBank: | |
| 9_ST_02-3 | Walder Steinenberg Switzerland | root of | N. Brenn | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP10 | 10_CS_15L_2 | Court, Switzerland | root of Picea abies | C.R. Grünig | [GenBank: | |
| 10_CS_9_1 | Court, Switzerland | root of | C.R. Grünig | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP11 | 11_AF196-16 | Varena plantation, Lithuania | root of | A. Menkis | [GenBank: | |
| 11_AF200-1 | Varena plantation, Lithuania | root of | A. Menkis | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP12 | 12_405_1 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 12_418_1 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP13 | 13_422_6v | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 13_414_2 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP14 | 14_426_4 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 14_444_6v | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP15 | 15_A_02-5 | Noonday, USA | n.a. | J. Hill | [GenBank: | |
| 15_A_08-4 | Noonday, USA | n.a. | J. Hill | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP16 | 16_428_6v | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 16_404_2 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP18 | 18_410_1 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 18_439_1 | Creux du Van, Switzerland | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | ||
| CSP19 | 19_1559-1 | Parco del Pollino, Italy | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: | |
| 19_1545-1 | Parco del Pollino, Italy | root of | V. Queloz | [GenBank: |
1 n.a. = information not available
Mating type ratios for populations of species belonging to the Phialocephala fortinii s.l. - Acephala applanata species complex (PAC)
| Species | Study site | Country | Marker type1 | Number of strains | Mating type ratios | Gametic disequilibrium | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of MLH | Significance2 | IA4 | ||||||||
| Rothwald | Austria | M | 24 | 7 | 4 | 3 | n.a. | |||
| Etang de la Gruère | Switzerland | M | 203 | 12 | 9 | 3 | * | 12 | 0.28 | |
| Uetliberg | Switzerland | RFLP | 145 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.07 | ||
| Zürichberg | Switzerland | RFLP | 48 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.13 | ||
| Parabock | Switzerland | M | 58 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.69 | ||
| Rothwald | Austria | M | 46 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 16 | -0.01 | ||
| Zürichberg | Switzerland | RFLP | 52 | 18 | 13 | 5 | * | 18 | 0.12 | |
| Redwater | Canada | M | 19 | 7 | 1 | 6 | n.a. | |||
| Alaska | USA | M | 19 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 0.41 | ||
| Catherine Creek | USA | M | 17 | 8 | 5 | 3 | n.a. | |||
| Sierra Nevada | USA | M | 10 | 9 | 7 | 2 | n.a. | |||
| Bödmeren | Switzerland | M | 28 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 17 | -0.18 | ||
| Scatlé | Switzerland | M | 36 | 31 | 12 | 19 | 25 | 0.02 | ||
| Rothwald | Austria | M | 86 | 40 | 23 | 17 | 38 | -0.12 | ||
| Alpes Maritimes | France | M | 77 | 43 | 24 | 19 | 34 | 0.05 | ||
| Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 123 | 51 | 27 | 24 | 43 | -0.08 | ||
| Derberence | Switzerland | M | 179 | 64 | 28 | 36 | 48 | -0.05 | ||
| Runcaglia | Switzerland | M | 95 | 45 | 22 | 23 | 41 | 0.02 | ||
| Zürichberg | Switzerland | RFLP | 130 | 46 | 26 | 20 | 46 | 0.04 | ||
| Yuba | USA | M | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | n.a. | |||
| Ala Archa | Kirgistan | M | 18 | 7 | 7 | 0 | n.a. | |||
| Baikalsee | Russia | M | 29 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 0.16 | ||
| Mansfield | Canada | M | 63 | 16 | 4 | 12 | * | 16 | 0.46 | |
| Sierra Nevada | USA | M | 47 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 0 | ||
| Zürichberg | Switzerland | RFLP | 40 | 15 | 11 | 4 | * | 15 | -0.03 | |
| Runcaglia | Switzerland | M | 98 | 36 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 0.02 | ||
| Alpes Maritimes | France | M | 17 | 6 | 4 | 2 | n.a. | |||
| Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 13 | 8 | 6 | 2 | n.a. | |||
| Etang de la Gruère | Switzerland | M | 15 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.05 | ||
| Massif Central/La Fage | France | M | 70 | 30 | 14 | 16 | 29 | -0.08 | ||
| Sheep Creek | USA | M | 12 | 7 | 2 | 5 | n.a. | |||
| Marsh Island | USA | M | 23 | 13 | 3 | 10 | * | 13 | 0.17 | |
| Pyrénées | France | M | 19 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 0.92 | ||
| Redwater | Canada | M | 12 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -0.06 | ||
| Baikalsee | Russia | M | 16 | 13 | 10 | 3 | * | 12 | 0.27 | |
| Bialowieza | Poland | M | 60 | 40 | 10 | 30 | ** | 40 | 2.12*** | |
| Noonday | USA | M | 22 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 0.11 | ||
| Grass Creek | USA | M | 28 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 21 | -0.22 | ||
| Rothwald | Austria | M | 43 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 0.70* | ||
| Derberence | Switzerland | M | 37 | 26 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 1.66*** | ||
| Valcartier | Canada | M | 35 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 28 | 0.48 | ||
| Bödmeren | Switzerland | M | 90 | 54 | 23 | 31 | 44 | 0.58 | ||
| Scatlé | Switzerland | M | 118 | 74 | 42 | 32 | 71 | 0.71** | ||
| Alpes Maritimes | France | M | 125 | 75 | 46 | 29 | * | 75 | 0.58* | |
| Campolino | Italia | M | 138 | 79 | 43 | 36 | 86 | 0.41 | ||
| Kevo | Finland | M | 138 | 87 | 44 | 43 | 72 | 0.52* | ||
| Glentanar | Scottland | M | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | ||||
| Bödmeren | Switzerland | M | 10 | 8 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Marsh Island | USA | M | 17 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | -0.17 | ||
| Noonday | USA | M | 11 | 7 | 2 | 5 | ||||
| Hill of Fare | Scottland | M | 23 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 | -0.07 | ||
| Valcartier | Canada | M | 23 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 0.37 | ||
| Etang de la Gruère | Switzerland | M | 24 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 23 | 0.29 | ||
| Bialowieza | Poland | M | 92 | 51 | 35 | 16 | * | 51 | 0.05 | |
| La Fage | France | M | 102 | 37 | 16 | 21 | 38 | 0.23 | ||
| Le Pirou | France | M | 13 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.22 | ||
| Tschornohora | Ukraine | M | 76 | 41 | 28 | 13 | * | 41 | 0.25 | |
| Kevo | Finland | M | 100 | 54 | 24 | 30 | 54 | 0.28 | ||
| CSP8 | Global | Global | M | 42 | 20 | 9 | 11 | |||
| CSP9 | Global | Global | M | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | n.a. | ||
| CSP10 | Global | Global | M | 30 | 5 | 4 | 1 | n.a. | ||
| CSP11 | Fuji | Japan | M | 20 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.59 | |
| Kevo | Finland | M | 12 | 7 | 4 | 3 | n.a. | |||
| CSP12 | Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 15 | 7 | 5 | 2 | n.a. | ||
| Chychkan | Kirgistan | M | 9 | 7 | 6 | 1 | n.a. | |||
| CSP13 | Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 43 | 23 | 9 | 12 | 23 | 0.66 | |
| Alaska | USA | M | 14 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 0.41 | ||
| CSP14 | Kevo | Finland | M | 16 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -0.18 | |
| Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 21 | 8 | 6 | 2 | n.a. | |||
| Zinal_Baiting | Switzerland | M | 72 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 25 | -0.19 | ||
| CSP15 | Noonday | USA | M | 28 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -0.7 | |
| CSP16 | Creux du Van | Switzerland | M | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n.a. | ||
| CSP18 | Global | Global | M | 20 | 4 | 1 | 3 | n.a. | ||
| CSP19 | Global | Global | M | 30 | 5 | 4 | 1 | n.a. | ||
1 Molecular markers used for clone-correction were 11 single-copy Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLP) or 12 microsatellite loci (M).
2 n.a. = not available; significance test was not performed due to small sample size; * = significant deviation from a 1:1 ratio.
3 MLH = Multilocus haplotypes inferred by RFLP or M; MLHs with missing data were excluded to calculate the index of association (IA).
4 * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001
Spatial distribution of mating types for selected PAC populations
| Species | Study site | Number of strains | Fraction of grid points with only one strain | Number of grid points with > 1 strain | Number of grid points and identified mating types | Association | chi-test | significance1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| both | [Q] | |||||||||
| Bödmeren | 28 | 0.65 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 0.33 | 18.75 | * | |
| Creux du Van | 135 | 0.26 | 35 | 21 | 15 | 11 | -0.03 | 4.41 | * | |
| Zürichberg | 129 | 0.24 | 42 | 20 | 21 | 14 | -0.22 | 3.60 | n.s. | |
| Scatlé | 35 | 0.21 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0.94 | 14.54 | * | |
| Derberence | 186 | 0.19 | 51 | 9 | 30 | 24 | -0.01 | 5.11 | * | |
| Zürichberg | 40 | 0.64 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 2 | -0.13 | 12.16 | * | |
| Bödmeren | 80 | 0.46 | 22 | 5 | 25 | 11 | 0.49 | 4.92 | * | |
| Derberence | 36 | 0.70 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 2 | -0.03 | 12.80 | * | |
| Scatlé | 115 | 0.30 | 30 | 17 | 11 | 15 | 0.43 | 3.61 | n.s. | |
| CSP13 | Creux du Van | 43 | 0.61 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 3 | 0.25 | 12.06 | * |
1 * = significant at p < 0.05; n.s. = not significant
Likelihood ratio tests comparing models of molecular evolution of MAT genes
| Gene | Analysis | λ1 | df1 | 2Δλ1 | dN/dS | Parameters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0: one ratio | -2205.4733 | 4 | 5.9586 | 0.2023 | 0.4280 | ω = 0.4280 | |
| M3: discrete (κ = 3) | -2202.4940 | 0.4462 | p0 = 0.3732, ω0 = 0.7052; p1 = 0.3932, ω1 = 0.1117; p2 = 0.2336, ω2 = 0.7052 | ||||
| M1a: nearly neutral | -2202.6642 | 2 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.4599 | p0 = 0.6556, ω0 = 0.1761; p1 = 0.3440, ω1 = 1 | |
| M2a: positive selection | -2202.6642 | 0.4599 | p0 = 0.6556, ω0 = 0.1761; p1 = 0.2332, ω1 = 1; p2 = 0.1109, ω2 = 1 | ||||
| M7: β | -2202.5615 | 2 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.4507 | p0 = 0.4117; q = 0.5019 | |
| M8: β & ω > 1 | -2202.5615 | 0.4507 | p0 = 0.1000 p = 0.4117 q = 0.5019; (p1 = 0.00001) ω = 1.0000 | ||||
| M0: one ratio | -1706.3379 | 4 | 20.5175 | 0.0004* | 0.295 | ω = 0.2951 | |
| M3: discrete (κ = 3) | -1696.0792 | 0.3103 | p0 = 0.0007, ω0 = 0.1116; p1 = 0.9232, ω1 = 0.1117; p2 = 0.0761, ω2 = 2.7212 | ||||
| M1a: nearly neutral | -1697.3663 | 2 | 2.5742 | 0.2761 | 0.2598 | p0 = 0.7402, ω0 = 0; p1 = 0.2598, ω1 = 1 | |
| M2a: positive selection | -1696.0792 | 0.3103 | p0 = 0.9239, ω0 = 0.1117; p1 = 0, ω1 = 1; p2 = 0.0761, ω2 = 2.7212 | ||||
| M7: β | -1697.6108 | 2 | 3.0594 | 0.2166 | 0.3000 | p = 0.0050; q = 0.0119 | |
| M8: β & ω > 1 | -1696.0811 | 0.3104 | p0 = 0.9244 p = 12.5791 q = 99.0000; (p1 = 0.0756) ω = 2.7290 | ||||
| M0: one ratio | -2133.8605 | 4 | 11.1677 | 0.0247* | 0.3714 | ω = 0.37135 | |
| M3: discrete (κ = 3) | -2128.2767 | 0.4212 | p0 = 0.3531, ω0 = 0.2495; p1 = 0.6157, ω1 = 0.2496; p2 = 0.0312, ω2 = 5.7427 | ||||
| M1a: nearly neutral | -2129.6740 | 2 | 2.7948 | 0.2472 | 0.3528 | p0 = 0.6472, ω0 = 0; p1 = 0.3528, ω1 = 1 | |
| M2a: positive selection | -2128.2767 | 0.4212 | p0 = 0.9688, ω0 = 0.2496; p1 = 0, ω1 = 1; p2 = 0.0312, ω2 = 5.7428 | ||||
| M7: β | -2129.8169 | 2 | 3.0800 | 0.2144 | 0.3387 | p = 0.0170; q = 0.0321 | |
| M8: β & ω > 1 | -2128.2769 | 0.4212 | p0 = 0.9690 p = 33.0717 q = 99.0000; (p1 = 0.0310) ω = 5.7612 |
Models of neutral evolution (M1a and M7) are tested against models that incorporate positive selection (M2a and M8). Comparison of M0 vs. M3 tests variable dN/dS rate ratios among sites. Model M3 classifies sites in the sequence into discrete classes (κ = 3) with both the dN/dS rate ratio ω0, ω1, ω3 and the proportions p0, p2 and p3 estimated from the data. For models M1a and M2a, values of p0, p1, and p2, are the proportions of sites inferred to be evolving under purifying selection, neutral evolution, and positive selection, respectively, and ω0, ω1 and ω2 are their corresponding dN/dS rate ratios. For models M7 and M8, the β distribution, β (p, q), describes the distribution of the dN/dS rate ratio between zero and one, and p0 is the proportion of sites within this distribution. In these models, p1 is the proportion of sites inferred to be under positive selection, and ω is the dN/dS rate ratio for those sites.