Literature DB >> 21959373

Risk models for progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration using demographic, environmental, genetic, and ocular factors.

Johanna M Seddon1, Robyn Reynolds, Yi Yu, Mark J Daly, Bernard Rosner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To expand our predictive models for progression to advanced stages of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) based on demographic, environmental, genetic, and ocular factors, using longer follow-up, time varying analyses, calculation of absolute risks, adjustment for competing risks, and detailed baseline AMD and drusen status.
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2937 individuals in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, of which 819 subjects progressed to advanced AMD during 12 years of follow-up.
METHODS: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to calculate hazard ratios for progression. Covariates included demographic and environmental factors, 6 variants in 5 genes, baseline macular drusen size, and presence and type of advanced AMD in 1 eye at baseline. To assess the ability of risk scores based on all covariates to discriminate between progressors and nonprogressors, an algorithm was developed and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. To validate the overall model, the total sample was randomly subdivided into derivation and test samples. Another model was built based on the derivation sample and assessed for calibration and discrimination in the test sample. Sample sizes needed for testing new treatments in clinical trials were estimated based on models with and without genetic variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression to advanced AMD, including geographic atrophy and neovascular disease.
RESULTS: In multivariate models, age, smoking, body mass index, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1, C3, C2, and CFB genes, as well as presence of advanced AMD in 1 eye and drusen size in both eyes were all independently associated with progression. The AUC for progression at 10 years in the model with genetic factors, drusen size, and environmental covariates was 0.915 in the total sample. In the test sample, based on a model estimated from the derivation sample, the AUC was 0.908. The sample sizes needed for clinical trials were estimated to be lower when genetic susceptibility was considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors reflective of nature and nurture were incorporated into an expanded algorithm for risk prediction, which performed very well in both derivation and test samples. Risk scores and predicted progression rates will be useful for AMD surveillance and for designing clinical trials. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959373      PMCID: PMC4097877          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  32 in total

1.  Variation in complement factor 3 is associated with risk of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Julian B Maller; Jesen A Fagerness; Robyn C Reynolds; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Johanna M Seddon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.

Authors:  B Rosner; R J Glynn
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-10

4.  Plasma complement components and activation fragments: associations with age-related macular degeneration genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  Robyn Reynolds; M Elizabeth Hartnett; John P Atkinson; Patricia C Giclas; Bernard Rosner; Johanna M Seddon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Dietary fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  J M Seddon; B Rosner; R D Sperduto; L Yannuzzi; J A Haller; N P Blair; W Willett
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08

6.  Development of a risk score for geographic atrophy in complications of the age-related macular degeneration prevention trial.

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Complement component 3: an assessment of association with AMD and analysis of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in a Northern Irish cohort.

Authors:  Gareth J McKay; Shilpa Dasari; Christopher C Patterson; Usha Chakravarthy; Giuliana Silvestri
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  A variant of mitochondrial protein LOC387715/ARMS2, not HTRA1, is strongly associated with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Atsuhiro Kanda; Wei Chen; Mohammad Othman; Kari E H Branham; Matthew Brooks; Ritu Khanna; Shirley He; Robert Lyons; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Prediction model for prevalence and incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration based on genetic, demographic, and environmental variables.

Authors:  Johanna M Seddon; Robyn Reynolds; Julian Maller; Jesen A Fagerness; Mark J Daly; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Variations in five genes and the severity of age-related macular degeneration: results from the Muenster aging and retina study.

Authors:  A Farwick; B Dasch; B H F Weber; D Pauleikhoff; M Stoll; H-W Hense
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  74 in total

1.  Prospective assessment of genetic effects on progression to different stages of age-related macular degeneration using multistate Markov models.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Robyn Reynolds; Bernard Rosner; Mark J Daly; Johanna M Seddon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Roles of three common VEGF polymorphisms in the risk of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Yuqing Liu; Siqing Hou; Weihua Lang; Dongshu Dai; Zhixue Wang; Xiangning Ji; Kun Li; Xi Zhang; Yuanyuan Zou; Jingxian Wang
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2014-04

Review 3.  Emerging roles for nuclear receptors in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Goldis Malek; Eleonora M Lad
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Genetic and environmental underpinnings to age-related ocular diseases.

Authors:  Johanna M Seddon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Clinical neurogenetics: stroke.

Authors:  Natalia S Rost
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  A risk score for the prediction of advanced age-related macular degeneration: development and validation in 2 prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Chiu; Paul Mitchell; Ronald Klein; Barbara E Klein; Min-Lee Chang; Gary Gensler; Allen Taylor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Prediction of age-related macular degeneration in the general population: the Three Continent AMD Consortium.

Authors:  Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Elena Rochtchina; Chelsea Myers; Cornelia M van Duijn; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Paulus T V M de Jong; Elizabeth G Holliday; Ava G Tan; André G Uitterlinden; Theru S Sivakumaran; John Attia; Albert Hofman; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Sudha K Iyengar; A Cecile J W Janssens; Jie Jin Wang; Ronald Klein; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Risk Prediction for Progression of Macular Degeneration: 10 Common and Rare Genetic Variants, Demographic, Environmental, and Macular Covariates.

Authors:  Johanna M Seddon; Rachel E Silver; Manlik Kwong; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Misclassification can explain most apparent regression of age-related macular degeneration: results from multistate models with misclassification.

Authors:  Ronald E Gangnon; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Sudha K Iyengar; Theru A Sivakumaran; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Inclusion of genotype with fundus phenotype improves accuracy of predicting choroidal neovascularization and geographic atrophy.

Authors:  Lorah T Perlee; Aruna T Bansal; Karen Gehrs; Jeffrey S Heier; Karl Csaky; Rando Allikmets; Paul Oeth; Toni Paladino; Daniel H Farkas; P Lyle Rawlings; Gregory S Hageman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.