Literature DB >> 21959205

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Heejung Kim1, Seok Hoon Jeong1, Myungsook Kim1, Yangsoon Lee1, Kyungwon Lee1.   

Abstract

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture is considered to be the standard diagnostic method for the detection of C. difficile infection (CDI). Culture methods are time-consuming and although enzyme immunoassay is rapid and easy to use, it has low sensitivity. In the present study, the AdvanSure CD real-time (RT)-PCR kit (LG Life Sciences) was evaluated for its ability to detect C. difficile toxin A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes, simultaneously. A total of 127 fresh diarrhoeal stool specimens, submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for C. difficile culture, were tested. C. difficile toxins and toxin genes were detected with a VIDAS C. difficile A&B (VIDAS-CDAB) enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit, respectively, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Their performance was compared with a standard toxigenic culture method as a reference. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values using the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit were 100 %, 98.3 %, 84.6 % and 100 %, respectively, while those of the VIDAS-CDAB system were 63.6 %, 100 %, 100 % and 96.6 %, respectively. Four tcdA(+)/tcdB(+) strains of C. difficile were detected with the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit, which offers comparable sensitivity and specificity to the reference method with a turnaround time of ~3 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959205     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.035618-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  The changing culture of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Louis Valiquette
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

4.  Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for Simultaneous Identification and Toxigenic Type Characterization of Clostridium difficile From Stool Samples.

Authors:  Abdullah Kilic; Mohammad J Alam; Naradah L Tisdel; Dhara N Shah; Mehmet Yapar; Todd M Lasco; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Wan Hee Kim; Myungsook Kim; Seok Hoon Jeong; Kyungwon Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin testing.

Authors:  Sevim Özsoy; Arzu İlki
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection: the First Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Korea.

Authors:  Hae-Sun Chung; Jeong Su Park; Bo-Moon Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  The high prevalence of Clostridioides difficile among nursing home elders associates with a dysbiotic microbiome.

Authors:  John P Haran; Doyle V Ward; Shakti K Bhattarai; Ethan Loew; Protiva Dutta; Amanda Higgins; Beth A McCormick; Vanni Bucci
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

10.  Analysis of risk factors and clinical manifestations associated with Clostridium difficile disease in Serbian hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Stojanović Predrag
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.476

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.