Literature DB >> 21956170

Workflow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens.

Mark-Anthony Bray1, Adam N Fraser, Thomas P Hasaka, Anne E Carpenter.   

Abstract

Automated microscopes have enabled the unprecedented collection of images at a rate that precludes visual inspection. Automated image analysis is required to identify interesting samples and extract quantitative information for high-content screening (HCS). However, researchers are impeded by the lack of metrics and software tools to identify image-based aberrations that pollute data, limiting experiment quality. The authors have developed and validated approaches to identify those image acquisition artifacts that prevent optimal extraction of knowledge from high-content microscopy experiments. They have implemented these as a versatile, open-source toolbox of algorithms and metrics readily usable by biologists to improve data quality in a wide variety of biological experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21956170      PMCID: PMC3593271          DOI: 10.1177/1087057111420292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition.

Authors:  X Wang; S Ghosh; S W Guo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Image analysis benchmarking methods for high-content screen design.

Authors:  C J Fuller; A F Straight
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Autofocusing in computer microscopy: selecting the optimal focus algorithm.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Stefan Duthaler; Bradley J Nelson
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 4.  An infrastructure for high-throughput microscopy: instrumentation, informatics, and integration.

Authors:  Eugeni A Vaisberg; David Lenzi; Richard L Hansen; Brigitte H Keon; Jeffrey T Finer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes.

Authors:  D J Field; N Brady
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  High resolution shading correction.

Authors:  M L Schultz; L E Lipkin; M J Wade; P F Lemkin; G M Carman
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms.

Authors:  F C Groen; I T Young; G Ligthart
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1985-03

8.  Single-cell-based image analysis of high-throughput cell array screens for quantification of viral infection.

Authors:  Petr Matula; Anil Kumar; Ilka Wörz; Holger Erfle; Ralf Bartenschlager; Roland Eils; Karl Rohr
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Enhanced CellClassifier: a multi-class classification tool for microscopy images.

Authors:  Benjamin Misselwitz; Gerhard Strittmatter; Balamurugan Periaswamy; Markus C Schlumberger; Samuel Rout; Peter Horvath; Karol Kozak; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  CellProfiler Analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens.

Authors:  Thouis R Jones; In Han Kang; Douglas B Wheeler; Robert A Lindquist; Adam Papallo; David M Sabatini; Polina Golland; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  32 in total

1.  A metric and workflow for quality control in the analysis of heterogeneity in phenotypic profiles and screens.

Authors:  Albert Gough; Tong Ying Shun; D Lansing Taylor; Mark Schurdak
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  SimuCell: a flexible framework for creating synthetic microscopy images.

Authors:  Satwik Rajaram; Benjamin Pavie; Nicholas E F Hac; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Quality Control for High-Throughput Imaging Experiments Using Machine Learning in Cellprofiler.

Authors:  Mark-Anthony Bray; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

4.  Impact of a five-dimensional framework on R&D productivity at AstraZeneca.

Authors:  Paul Morgan; Dean G Brown; Simon Lennard; Mark J Anderton; J Carl Barrett; Ulf Eriksson; Mark Fidock; Bengt Hamrén; Anthony Johnson; Ruth E March; James Matcham; Jerome Mettetal; David J Nicholls; Stefan Platz; Steve Rees; Michael A Snowden; Menelas N Pangalos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Rapid development of cloud-native intelligent data pipelines for scientific data streams using the HASTE Toolkit.

Authors:  Ben Blamey; Salman Toor; Martin Dahlö; Håkan Wieslander; Philip J Harrison; Ida-Maria Sintorn; Alan Sabirsh; Carolina Wählby; Ola Spjuth; Andreas Hellander
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  'Cytology-on-a-chip' based sensors for monitoring of potentially malignant oral lesions.

Authors:  Timothy J Abram; Pierre N Floriano; Nicolaos Christodoulides; Robert James; A Ross Kerr; Martin H Thornhill; Spencer W Redding; Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Paul M Speight; Julie Vick; Craig Murdoch; Christine Freeman; Anne M Hegarty; Katy D'Apice; Joan A Phelan; Patricia M Corby; Ismael Khouly; Jerry Bouquot; Nagi M Demian; Y Etan Weinstock; Stephanie Rowan; Chih-Ko Yeh; H Stan McGuff; Frank R Miller; Surabhi Gaur; Kailash Karthikeyan; Leander Taylor; Cathy Le; Michael Nguyen; Humberto Talavera; Rameez Raja; Jorge Wong; John T McDevitt
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Biomedical Image Processing with Containers and Deep Learning: An Automated Analysis Pipeline: Data architecture, artificial intelligence, automated processing, containerization, and clusters orchestration ease the transition from data acquisition to insights in medium-to-large datasets.

Authors:  Germán González; Conor L Evans
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Deep learning-based autofocus method enhances image quality in light-sheet fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Chen Li; Adele Moatti; Xuying Zhang; H Troy Ghashghaei; Alon Greenabum
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes.

Authors:  Mark-Anthony Bray; Shantanu Singh; Han Han; Chadwick T Davis; Blake Borgeson; Cathy Hartland; Maria Kost-Alimova; Sigrun M Gustafsdottir; Christopher C Gibson; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  TFEB Transcriptional Responses Reveal Negative Feedback by BHLHE40 and BHLHE41.

Authors:  Kimberly L Carey; Geraldine L C Paulus; Lingfei Wang; Dale R Balce; Jessica W Luo; Phil Bergman; Ianina C Ferder; Lingjia Kong; Nicole Renaud; Shantanu Singh; Maria Kost-Alimova; Beat Nyfeler; Kara G Lassen; Herbert W Virgin; Ramnik J Xavier
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.