Literature DB >> 21954161

Dynamics of homology searching during gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by donor competition.

Eric Coïc1, Joshua Martin, Taehyun Ryu, Sue Yen Tay, Jané Kondev, James E Haber.   

Abstract

One of the least understood aspects of homologous recombination is the process by which the ends of a double-strand break (DSB) search the entire genome for homologous templates that can be used to repair the break. We took advantage of the natural competition between the alternative donors HML and HMR employed during HO endonuclease-induced switching of the budding yeast MAT locus. The strong mating-type-dependent bias in the choice of the donors is enforced by the recombination enhancer (RE), which lies 17 kb proximal to HML. We investigated factors that improve the use of the disfavored donor. We show that the normal heterochromatic state of the donors does not impair donor usage, as donor choice is not affected by removing this epigenetic silencing. In contrast, increasing the length of homology shared by the disfavored donor increases its use. This result shows that donor choice is not irrevocable and implies that there are several encounters between the DSB ends and even the favored donor before recombination is accomplished. The increase by adding more homology is not linear; these results can be explained by a thermodynamic model that determines the energy cost of using one donor over the other. An important inference from this analysis is that when HML is favored as the donor, RE causes a reduction in its effective genomic distance from MAT from 200 kb to ∼20 kb, which we hypothesize occurs after the DSB is created, by epigenetic chromatin modifications around MAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21954161      PMCID: PMC3241425          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.132738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  36 in total

Review 1.  Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer.

Authors:  K Rippe
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 2.  Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators.

Authors:  Patrick Sung; Lumir Krejci; Stephen Van Komen; Michael G Sehorn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Capturing chromosome conformation.

Authors:  Job Dekker; Karsten Rippe; Martijn Dekker; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating-type locus HMRa.

Authors:  A Ravindra; K Weiss; R T Simpson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Real-time analysis of double-strand DNA break repair by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Wade M Hicks; Miyuki Yamaguchi; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination.

Authors:  Neal Sugawara; Xuan Wang; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Recruitment of the recombinational repair machinery to a DNA double-strand break in yeast.

Authors:  Branden Wolner; Stephen van Komen; Patrick Sung; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Anna Malkova; Giordano Liberi; Marco Foiani; James E Haber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Mating type-dependent constraints on the mobility of the left arm of yeast chromosome III.

Authors:  Debra A Bressan; Julio Vazquez; James E Haber
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  17 in total

1.  Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Cheng-Sheng Lee; Ruoxi W Wang; Hsiao-Han Chang; Daniel Capurso; Mark R Segal; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein; Giedrė Bačinskaja; Jun Che; Anais Cheblal; Rajula Elango; Anastasiya Epshtein; Devon M Fitzgerald; Belén Gómez-González; Sharik R Khan; Sandeep Kumar; Bryan A Leland; Léa Marie; Qian Mei; Judith Miné-Hattab; Alicja Piotrowska; Erica J Polleys; Christopher D Putnam; Elina A Radchenko; Anissia Ait Saada; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Eun Yong Shim; Mathew Stracy; Jun Xia; Zhenxin Yan; Yi Yin; Andrés Aguilera; Juan Lucas Argueso; Catherine H Freudenreich; Susan M Gasser; Dmitry A Gordenin; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Megan C King; Richard D Kolodner; Andrei Kuzminov; Sarah Ae Lambert; Sang Eun Lee; Kyle M Miller; Sergei M Mirkin; Thomas D Petes; Susan M Rosenberg; Rodney Rothstein; Lorraine S Symington; Pawel Zawadzki; Nayun Kim; Michael Lisby; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2019-01-07

3.  Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break-Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Anuja Mehta; Annette Beach; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Mechanisms and principles of homology search during recombination.

Authors:  Jörg Renkawitz; Claudio A Lademann; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Dynamic Processing of Displacement Loops during Recombinational DNA Repair.

Authors:  Aurèle Piazza; Shanaya Shital Shah; William Douglass Wright; Steven K Gore; Romain Koszul; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Moving forward one step back at a time: reversibility during homologous recombination.

Authors:  Aurèle Piazza; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Multi-invasions Are Recombination Byproducts that Induce Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  Aurèle Piazza; William Douglass Wright; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  ATP hydrolysis provides functions that promote rejection of pairings between different copies of long repeated sequences.

Authors:  Claudia Danilowicz; Laura Hermans; Vincent Coljee; Chantal Prévost; Mara Prentiss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Sgs1 and Exo1 suppress targeted chromosome duplication during ends-in and ends-out gene targeting.

Authors:  Anamarija Štafa; Marina Miklenić; Bojan Zunar; Berislav Lisnić; Lorraine S Symington; Ivan-Krešimir Svetec
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.