Literature DB >> 21953523

Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Berkan Resorlu1, Cengiz Kara, Eylem Burcu Resorlu, Ali Unsal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography and to determine whether ionizing radiation is necessary in the postoperative follow-up of children undergoing ureteroscopy.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 49 children who underwent 51 ureteroscopic procedures for ureteral calculi. Renal ultrasound and intravenous urography were performed in all patients at 3 months after surgery for postoperative evaluation.
RESULTS: In three cases, stones migrated to the kidney. Retrograde intrarenal surgery was performed in two patients and one patient required shockwave lithotripsy to become stone-free. Fourty-six children were completely stone-free and 3 had residual fragments on plain film in the postoperative 3 month. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of ultrasonography for detecting hydronephrosis were 85.7, 100, 97.7 and 100%, respectively. Two patients under observation and three patients under medical expulsive therapy had resolution of hydronephrosis on follow-up. One patient required ureteroscopy for residual obstructing fragments.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography has limited accuracy for detecting residual ureteral stones, but it is a highly specific and reasonably sensitive test for detecting hydronephrosis. A combination of ultrasonography and plain film is a safe and effective imaging procedure in postoperative follow-up of children undergoing ureteroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21953523     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-011-2979-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  22 in total

1.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.

Authors:  Orlando Catalano; Antonio Nunziata; Francesco Altei; Alfredo Siani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Follow-up functional radiographic studies are not mandatory for all patients after ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Charles E Bugg; Rizk El-Galley; Phillip J Kenney; John R Burns
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tricia D Greene; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Is routine radiological surveillance mandatory after uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal?

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Murat Baykal; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Use of renal ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis after ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jules P Manger; Pierre J Mendoza; Richard K Babayan; David S Wang
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Alon Z Weizer; Brian K Auge; Ari D Silverstein; Fernando C Delvecchio; Ricardo M Brizuela; Philipp Dahm; Paul K Pietrow; Bertram R Lewis; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction.

Authors:  P H Ellenbogen; F W Scheible; L B Talner; G R Leopold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Anthony T Corcoran; Steven G Docimo; Michael C Ost
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor regarding the article "Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation".

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Re: Imaging the urologic patient: the utility of intravenous pyelogram in the CT scan era.

Authors:  Mustafa Resorlu; Gurhan Adam; Fatma Uysal; Eyup Burak Sancak; Huseyin Ozdemir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The accuracy of urinary ultrasound in the diagnosis of urinary stone disease in patients with acute flank pain: is it influenced by the time of ultrasound performance during the day or week?

Authors:  Mustafa Resorlu; Mohamed Ismat Abdulmajed; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Can Ates; Fatma Uysal; Gurhan Adam; Nilufer Aylanc; Sibel Cevizci; Alpaslan Akbas; Eyup Burak Sancak; Murat Tolga Gulpinar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  The technical details of treatment of kidney stone in children.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Musfata Gunes; Fatih Elbir; Tolga Akman; Huseyin Kilincaslan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-09-16

6.  Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2 cm) in children.

Authors:  Hongliang Jia; Jiuzhi Li; Bide Liu; Peixin Zhang; Ainiwaer Yusufu; Yukui Nan; Xun Li; Bin Wen; Chunlin Pu; Weili Du; Shuheng Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A Giant Ureteral Stone without Underlying Anatomic or Metabolic Abnormalities: A Case Report.

Authors:  Selcuk Sarikaya; Berkan Resorlu; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Ural Oguz; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2013-11-13

8.  Is a contrast study really necessary prior to ureteroscopy?

Authors:  O Bayrak; A Demirbas; O G Doluoglu; T Karakan; B Resorlu; S Kardas; A Tepeler; S Tangal; S Adanur; O Celik
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.590

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.