Literature DB >> 18294031

Is routine radiological surveillance mandatory after uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal?

Mert Ali Karadag1, Ahmet Tefekli, Fatih Altunrende, Abdulkadir Tepeler, Murat Baykal, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stricture formation and obstruction are rare but significant complications after ureteroscopy (URS), and there are controversial studies regarding follow-up. Our study sought to determine the appropriate follow-up for patients without complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 323 patients were treated with URS for removal of ureteric stones, and their charts were retrospectively reviewed. A semirigid ureteroscope was used in all patients, and stone disintegration was accomplished with a pneumatic lithotriptor. Postoperative evaluation included plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) on day 1, intravenous urography (IVU) and/or ultrasonography at postoperative month 3 and annually thereafter in all patients. A KUB radiograph was also obtained on postoperative day (POD) 10 in patients with residual fragments.
RESULTS: Complete records of 268 patients were available. The overall success rate was 95.5%. The KUB radiograph on POD 1 revealed complete stone removal in 217 (80.9%) patients, while residual fragments were seen in 40 (14.9%) patients, who were reevaluated on POD 10. Evaluation on POD 10 showed residual fragments in 15 patients, and URS was again performed in eight patients. Perioperative minor complications were observed in 18 (6.7%) patients. IVU performed in the third postoperative month showed stricture formation in two (0.7%) patients and silent obstruction in one (0.3%). No stricture formation was observed in asymptomatic patients after uncomplicated complete stone removal. After a mean follow-up of 27.4 +/- 13.7 (range 12-58) months, annual radiologic studies did not show any additional complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that radiologic surveillance for stricture formation and obstruction is not mandatory after complete stone removal with uncomplicated URS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294031     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Cengiz Kara; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Evaluation of postoperative hydronephrosis following semirigid ureteroscopy: Incidence and predictors.

Authors:  Mehmet İlker Gökçe; Barış Esen; Başak Gülpınar; Adil Hüseynov; Mete Özkidik; Evren Süer
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  Low dose lignocaine + butorphanol vs. low dose bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in day care urological surgeries: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Shahil Rameshbhai Khant; Rajeev Chaudhari; Rishikesh Arun Kore; Shirish Bhagwat; Ranjan Purushottam Jakhalekar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

4.  Is a contrast study really necessary prior to ureteroscopy?

Authors:  O Bayrak; A Demirbas; O G Doluoglu; T Karakan; B Resorlu; S Kardas; A Tepeler; S Tangal; S Adanur; O Celik
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Clinical factors associated with postoperative hydronephrosis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Sun Woo Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Sang Un Yim; Yang Hyun Cho; Bo Sung Shin; Ho Seok Chung; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Kyung Jin Oh; Sun-Ouck Kim; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-08-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.