Literature DB >> 21951970

Economic burden and cost determinants of deep vein thrombosis during 2 years following diagnosis: a prospective evaluation.

R Guanella1, T Ducruet, M Johri, M-J Miron, A Roussin, S Desmarais, F Joyal, J Kassis, S Solymoss, J S Ginsberg, D L Lamping, I Shrier, S R Kahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the long-term economic consequences of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). None of them have incorporated prospectively collected clinical data to ensure accurate identification of incident cases of DVT and DVT-related health outcomes of interest, such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS).
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively quantify medical and non-medical resource use and costs related to DVT during 2 years following diagnosis, and to identify clinical determinants of costs.
METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients with acute DVT were recruited at seven Canadian hospital centers. Resource use and cost information were retrieved from three sources: weekly patient-completed cost diaries, nurse-completed case report forms, and the Quebec provincial administrative healthcare database (RAMQ).
RESULTS: The rate of DVT-related hospitalization was 3.5 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-4.9). Patients reported a mean (standard deviation) of 15.0 (14.5) physician visits and 0.7 (1.2) other healthcare professional visits. The average cost of DVT was $5180 (95% CI $4344-6017) in Canadian dollars, with 51.6% of costs being attributable to non-medical resource use. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of costs: concomitant pulmonary embolism (relative increase in cost [RIC] 3.16; 95% CI 2.18-4.58), unprovoked DVT (RIC 1.65; 95% CI 1.28-2.13), development of PTS during follow-up (RIC 1.35; 95% CI 1.05-1.74), and management of DVT in the inpatient setting (RIC 1.79; 95% CI 1.33-2.40).
CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of DVT is substantial. The use of measures to prevent the occurrence of PTS and favoring outpatient care of DVT has the potential to diminish costs.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04516.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  35 in total

Review 1.  Knowns and Unknowns in Managing Postthrombotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Improving anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  John R Fanikos; Julie K Atay; Jean M Connors
Journal:  P T       Date:  2013-03

4.  Effectiveness of catheter directed thrombolysis and stent implantation on iliofemoral vein thrombosis caused by iliac vein compression.

Authors:  Zhi-Bing Ming; Wen-Dong Li; Rui-Fan Yuan; Xiao-Qiang Li; Wen-Bin Ding
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone as an induction regimen for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A Prica; K Chan; M Cheung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Venous thromboembolism and subsequent permanent work-related disability.

Authors:  S K Braekkan; S D Grosse; E M Okoroh; J Tsai; S C Cannegieter; I A Naess; S Krokstad; J-B Hansen; F E Skjeldestad
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  The post-thrombotic syndrome: a 2012 therapeutic update.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Galanaud; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-04

8.  Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in elderly patients with hospital acquired venous thromboembolism: a case control study.

Authors:  Jason Suh; Amishi Desai; Anish Desai; Josephine Dela Cruz; Anusiyanthan Mariampillai; Alexander Hindenburg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Cost-effectiveness of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  T Enden; S Resch; C White; H S Wik; N E Kløw; P M Sandset
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Rationale and design of the ATTRACT Study: a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for the prevention of postthrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Susan R Kahn; Jim Julian; Elizabeth Magnuson; Michael R Jaff; Timothy P Murphy; David J Cohen; Anthony J Comerota; Heather L Gornik; Mahmood K Razavi; Lawrence Lewis; Clive Kearon
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.