Literature DB >> 27411161

Venous thromboembolism and subsequent permanent work-related disability.

S K Braekkan1,2,3, S D Grosse4, E M Okoroh5, J Tsai5, S C Cannegieter6, I A Naess7, S Krokstad8, J-B Hansen9,10,11, F E Skjeldestad12.   

Abstract

Essentials The burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) related to permanent work-related disability is unknown. In a cohort of 66 005 individuals, the risk of work-related disability after a VTE was assessed. Unprovoked VTE was associated with 52% increased risk of work-related disability. This suggests that indirect costs due to loss of work time may add to the economic burden of VTE.
SUMMARY: Background The burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) related to permanent work-related disability has never been assessed among a general population. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of work-related disability in subjects with incident VTE compared with those without VTE in a population-based cohort. Methods From the Tromsø Study and the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), Norway, 66 005 individuals aged 20-65 years were enrolled in 1994-1997 and followed to 31 December 2008. Incident VTE events among the study participants were identified and validated, and information on work-related disability was obtained from the Norwegian National Insurance Administration database. Cox-regression models using age as time-scale and VTE as time-varying exposure were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for sex, body mass index, smoking, education level, marital status, history of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and self-rated general health. Results During follow-up, 384 subjects had a first VTE and 9862 participants were granted disability pension. The crude incidence rate of work-related disability after VTE was 37.5 (95% CI, 29.7-47.3) per 1000 person-years, vs. 13.5 (13.2-13.7) per 1000 person-years among those without VTE. Subjects with unprovoked VTE had a 52% higher risk of work-related disability than those without VTE (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.09-2.14) after multivariable adjustment, and the association appeared to be driven by deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion VTE was associated with subsequent work-related disability in a cohort recruited from the general working-age population. Our findings suggest that indirect costs because of loss of work time may add to the economic burden of VTE.
© 2016 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep vein thrombosis; disability; risk; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27411161      PMCID: PMC5083219          DOI: 10.1111/jth.13411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  44 in total

1.  An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study.

Authors:  M M Samama
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000 Dec 11-25

2.  The venous stasis syndrome after deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: a population-based study.

Authors:  D N Mohr; M D Silverstein; J A Heit; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Body height and risk of venous thromboembolism: The Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Sigrid K Braekkan; Knut H Borch; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Inger Njølstad; Tom Wilsgaard; John-Bjarne Hansen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after a first episode of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Cecilia Becattini; Giancarlo Agnelli; Raffaele Pesavento; Mauro Silingardi; Renzo Poggio; Maria Rita Taliani; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Arterial cardiovascular risk factors and venous thrombosis: results from a population-based, prospective study (the HUNT 2).

Authors:  Petter Quist-Paulsen; Inger Anne Naess; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Pål R Romundstad; Sverre C Christiansen; Frits R Rosendaal; Jens Hammerstrøm
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Trevor Baglin; Roger Luddington; Karen Brown; Caroline Baglin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; David R Morrison; Jacqueline M Cohen; Jessica Emed; Vicky Tagalakis; Andre Roussin; William Geerts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-16

Review 8.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Richard H White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Long-term outcomes of deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  R J Beyth; A M Cohen; C S Landefeld
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-22

10.  Effects of self-rated health on sick leave, disability pension, hospital admissions and mortality. A population-based longitudinal study of nearly 15,000 observations among Swedish women and men.

Authors:  Christina Halford; Thorne Wallman; Lennart Welin; Annika Rosengren; Annika Bardel; Saga Johansson; Henry Eriksson; Ed Palmer; Lars Wilhelmsen; Kurt Svärdsudd
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cost-of-illness models for venous thromboembolism: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 2.  Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pamela L Lutsey; Neil A Zakai
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 49.421

Review 3.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis of deep vein thrombosis: literature review and practice considerations.

Authors:  Drew Fleck; Hassan Albadawi; Fadi Shamoun; Grace Knuttinen; Sailendra Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

4.  Long-Term Association of Venous Thromboembolism With Frailty, Physical Functioning, and Quality of Life: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Pamela L Lutsey; B Gwen Windham; Jeffrey R Misialek; Mary Cushman; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Saonli Basu; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  The Interaction Between Venous Thromboembolism and Socioeconomic Status on the Risk of Disability Pension.

Authors:  Helle Jørgensen; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Kristina Laugesen; Sigrid K Braekkan; John-Bjarne Hansen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.814

6.  Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Patients: Incidence and Adequacy of Thromboprophylaxis - A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Naseem Ambra; Osama Hashim Mohammad; Vamanjore A Naushad; Nishan K Purayil; Mohamed G Mohamedali; Abdel Naser Elzouki; Muayad Kasim Khalid; Memon Noor Illahi; Azeez Palol; Manish Barman; Muhammad Sharif; Sajid Chalihadan; Ashraf Punnorath; Abdelrahman Mostafa; Bassem Al Hariri; Tameem G M Khidir; Irfan Varikkodan
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-07-24

Review 7.  Pregnancy, thrombophilia, and the risk of a first venous thrombosis: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Nanne Croles; Kazem Nasserinejad; Johannes J Duvekot; Marieke Jha Kruip; Karina Meijer; Frank Wg Leebeek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-26

8.  Self-rated health and venous thromboembolism among middle-aged women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Nymberg; Emelie Stenman; Susanna Calling; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Bengt Zöller
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.