Literature DB >> 1294644

Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.

J D Waye1, B S Lewis, S Yessayan.   

Abstract

Patients (N = 2,097) undergoing ambulatory office colonoscopy were followed to determine the incidence of endoscopic complications. In this group, 1,320 patients had diagnostic colonoscopy with or without biopsy; 777 patients had 2,019 polyps removed. Three of 2,097 patients (0.1%) had transient hypotension requiring i.v. fluid resuscitation and oxygen administration. All patients went home without sequelae. Acute postpolypectomy bleeding occurred in 11 of 777 patients (1%) requiring acute management; bleeding was controlled during colonoscopy in all. Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred in 9 of 777 patients (1%). All patients were treated medically. Late postpolypectomy bleeding occurred in 15 of 777 patients (2%). Perforation occurred in two of 777 patients (0.3%), at 1 and 9 days postpolypectomy. Both patients underwent surgery with uneventful recoveries. We conclude that office colonoscopy including polypectomy is safe. The overall complication rate for therapeutic ambulatory colonoscopy was 5%, with major events requiring hospitalization in 2% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1294644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  84 in total

1.  Fatal dysnatraemia caused by elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Carlos Ayus; Robert Levine; Allen I Arieff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

Review 2.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

3.  Pseudomembranous Colitis Caused by C. difficile.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06

Review 4.  [Minimal invasive therapy of "early" tumors].

Authors:  E Frimberger; H Feussner; H Allescher; T Rösch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B P Saunders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management.

Authors:  Daniel Blero; Jacques Devière
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Factors affecting the treatment of multiple colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Emanuele D L Urso; Riccardo Nascimbeni; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Marco Agostini; Claudio Casella; Dario Moneghini; Diego Di Lorenzo; Isacco Maretto; Maribel Sullivan; Isabella Mammi; Alessandra Viel; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.