Literature DB >> 21950902

Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs.

Matthew F Gornet1, Frank W Chan, John C Coleman, Brian Murrell, Russ P Nockels, Brett A Taylor, Todd H Lanman, Jorge A Ochoa.   

Abstract

The concept of semi-rigid fixation (SRF) has driven the development of spinal implants that utilize nonmetallic materials and novel rod geometries in an effort to promote fusion via a balance of stability, intra- and inter-level load sharing, and durability. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and biomechanical properties of a pedicle screw-based polyetheretherketone (PEEK) SRF system for the lumbar spine to compare its kinematic, structural, and durability performance profile against that of traditional lumbar fusion systems. Performance of the SRF system was characterized using a validated spectrum of experimental, computational, and in vitro testing. Finite element models were first used to optimize the size and shape of the polymeric rods and bound their performance parameters. Subsequently, benchtop tests determined the static and dynamic performance threshold of PEEK rods in relevant loading modes (flexion-extension (F/E), axial rotation (AR), and lateral bending (LB)). Numerical analyses evaluated the amount of anteroposterior column load sharing provided by both metallic and PEEK rods. Finally, a cadaveric spine simulator was used to determine the level of stability that PEEK rods provide. Under physiological loading conditions, a 6.35 mm nominal diameter oval PEEK rod construct unloads the bone-screw interface and increases anterior column load (approx. 75% anterior, 25% posterior) when compared to titanium (Ti) rod constructs. The PEEK construct's stiffness demonstrated a value lower than that of all the metallic rod systems, regardless of diameter or metallic composition (78% < 5.5 mm Ti; 66% < 4.5 mm Ti; 38% < 3.6 mm Ti). The endurance limit of the PEEK construct was comparable to that of clinically successful metallic rod systems (135N at 5 × 10(6) cycles). Compared to the intact state, cadaveric spines implanted with PEEK constructs demonstrated a significant reduction of range of motion in all three loading directions (> 80% reduction in F/E, p < 0.001; > 70% reduction in LB, p < 0.001; > 54% reduction in AR, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the stability provided by the PEEK rods and titanium rods in any mode (p = 0.769 for F/E; p = 0.085 for LB; p = 0.633 for AR). The CD HORIZON(®) LEGACY(™) PEEK Rod System provided intervertebral stability comparable to currently marketed titanium lumbar fusion constructs. PEEK rods also more closely approximated the physiologic anteroposterior column load sharing compared to results with titanium rods. The durability, stability, strength, and biomechanical profile of PEEK rods were demonstrated and the potential advantages of SRF were highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21950902     DOI: 10.1115/1.4004862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  20 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Semirigid (WavefleX) and Rigid System for the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Do-Keun Kim; Hyunkeun Lim; Dae Cheol Rim; Chang Hyun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 2.  Clinical and biomechanical researches of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chan Li; Lei Liu; Jian-Yong Shi; Kai-Zhong Yan; Wei-Zhong Shen; Zhen-Rong Yang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Rolf Sobottke; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Herren; Agnes Beckmann; Kourosh Zarghooni; Jan Siewe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effects of rod stiffness and fusion mass on the adjacent segments after floating mono-segmental fusion: a study using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yong Jun Jin; Young Eun Kim; Jung Ho Seo; Hae Won Choi; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Retrieval analysis of PEEK rods for posterior fusion and motion preservation.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Todd H Lanman; Genymphas Higgs; Daniel W Macdonald; Sigurd H Berven; Jorge E Isaza; Eual Phillips; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of clinical and radiological results of dynamic and rigid instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Eyup Varol; Mustafa Umut Etli; Furkan Avci; Cumhur Kaan Yaltirik; Ali Fatih Ramazanoglu; Mehmet Resid Onen; Sait Naderi
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

8.  Lumbar Fusion With Polyetheretherketone Rods Use for Patients With Degenerative Disease.

Authors:  Donald A Ross; Miner N Ross
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-04

9.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  In Vitro Comparison of Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium Constructs in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Matthew S Yeager; Daniel J Cook; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.