Literature DB >> 21950470

Permutation tests for random effects in linear mixed models.

Oliver E Lee1, Thomas M Braun.   

Abstract

Inference regarding the inclusion or exclusion of random effects in linear mixed models is challenging because the variance components are located on the boundary of their parameter space under the usual null hypothesis. As a result, the asymptotic null distribution of the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests will not have the typical χ(2) distribution. Although it has been proved that the correct asymptotic distribution is a mixture of χ(2) distributions, the appropriate mixture distribution is rather cumbersome and nonintuitive when the null and alternative hypotheses differ by more than one random effect. As alternatives, we present two permutation tests, one that is based on the best linear unbiased predictors and one that is based on the restricted likelihood ratio test statistic. Both methods involve weighted residuals, with the weights determined by the among- and within-subject variance components. The null permutation distributions of our statistics are computed by permuting the residuals both within and among subjects and are valid both asymptotically and in small samples. We examine the size and power of our tests via simulation under a variety of settings and apply our test to a published data set of chronic myelogenous leukemia patients.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21950470      PMCID: PMC3883440          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01675.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  The use of score tests for inference on variance components.

Authors:  Geert Verbeke; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A note on permutation tests for variance components in multilevel generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Fixed and random effects selection in linear and logistic models.

Authors:  Satkartar K Kinney; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  C H Morrell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.

Authors:  D O Stram; J W Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A biological marker model for predicting disease transitions.

Authors:  J P Klein; J H Klotz; M R Grever
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Testing random effects in the linear mixed model using approximate bayes factors.

Authors:  Benjamin R Saville; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Detecting treatment-covariate interactions using permutation methods.

Authors:  Rui Wang; David A Schoenfeld; Bettina Hoeppner; A Eden Evins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Exploring the Relationships Between Autozygosity, Educational Attainment, and Cognitive Ability in a Contemporary, Trans-Ancestral American Sample.

Authors:  Sarah Mc Colbert; Matthew C Keller; Arpana Agrawal; Emma C Johnson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.965

3.  Fast and powerful heritability inference for family-based neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Habib Ganjgahi; Anderson M Winkler; David C Glahn; John Blangero; Peter Kochunov; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Permutation-based variance component test in generalized linear mixed model with application to multilocus genetic association study.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Yang Zhao; Hongliang Li; Ting Wang; Feng Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Detecting the Genomic Signature of Divergent Selection in Presence of Gene Flow.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Ting Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.236

6.  A cautionary note on ignoring polygenic background when mapping quantitative trait loci via recombinant congenic strains.

Authors:  J Concepción Loredo-Osti
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  DTNI: a novel toxicogenomics data analysis tool for identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of toxic compounds.

Authors:  Diana M Hendrickx; Terezinha Souza; Danyel G J Jennen; Jos C S Kleinjans
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Left hemisphere dominance for bilateral kinematic encoding in the human brain.

Authors:  Christina M Merrick; Tanner C Dixon; Assaf Breska; Jack Lin; Edward F Chang; David King-Stephens; Kenneth D Laxer; Peter B Weber; Jose Carmena; Robert Thomas Knight; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The West Philadelphia asthma care implementation study (NHLBI# U01HL138687).

Authors:  Tyra Bryant-Stephens; Yolanda Williams; Janani Kanagasundaram; Andrea Apter; Chén C Kenyon; Justine Shults
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-11-16

10.  Fiddler crab electroretinograms reveal vast circadian shifts in visual sensitivity and temporal summation in dim light.

Authors:  Emelie A Brodrick; Martin J How; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.