Literature DB >> 18759835

Testing random effects in the linear mixed model using approximate bayes factors.

Benjamin R Saville1, Amy H Herring.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Deciding which predictor effects may vary across subjects is a difficult issue. Standard model selection criteria and test procedures are often inappropriate for comparing models with different numbers of random effects due to constraints on the parameter space of the variance components. Testing on the boundary of the parameter space changes the asymptotic distribution of some classical test statistics and causes problems in approximating Bayes factors. We propose a simple approach for testing random effects in the linear mixed model using Bayes factors. We scale each random effect to the residual variance and introduce a parameter that controls the relative contribution of each random effect free of the scale of the data. We integrate out the random effects and the variance components using closed-form solutions. The resulting integrals needed to calculate the Bayes factor are low-dimensional integrals lacking variance components and can be efficiently approximated with Laplace's method. We propose a default prior distribution on the parameter controlling the contribution of each random effect and conduct simulations to show that our method has good properties for model selection problems. Finally, we illustrate our methods on data from a clinical trial of patients with bipolar disorder and on data from an environmental study of water disinfection by-products and male reproductive outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18759835      PMCID: PMC3136354          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  The use of score tests for inference on variance components.

Authors:  Geert Verbeke; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Random effects selection in linear mixed models.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Bayesian covariance selection in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Bo Cai; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Fixed and random effects selection in linear and logistic models.

Authors:  Satkartar K Kinney; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.

Authors:  D O Stram; J W Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Joseph R Calabrese; Charles L Bowden; Gary Sachs; Lakshmi N Yatham; Kirsten Behnke; Olli-Pekka Mehtonen; Paul Montgomery; John Ascher; Walter Paska; Nancy Earl; Joseph DeVeaugh-Geiss
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.384

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Permutation tests for random effects in linear mixed models.

Authors:  Oliver E Lee; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Exact variance component tests for longitudinal microbiome studies.

Authors:  Jing Zhai; Kenneth Knox; Homer L Twigg; Hua Zhou; Jin J Zhou
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Boosting Gene Mapping Power and Efficiency with Efficient Exact Variance Component Tests of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Sets.

Authors:  Jin J Zhou; Tao Hu; Dandi Qiao; Michael H Cho; Hua Zhou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Bayesian model selection in complex linear systems, as illustrated in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Wen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Fox; Joris Mulder; Sandip Sinharay
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Assessing variance components in multilevel linear models using approximate Bayes factors: A case study of ethnic disparities in birthweight.

Authors:  Benjamin R Saville; Amy H Herring; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Catching a ball at the right time and place: individual factors matter.

Authors:  Benedetta Cesqui; Andrea d'Avella; Alessandro Portone; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feature selection for high-dimensional temporal data.

Authors:  Michail Tsagris; Vincenzo Lagani; Ioannis Tsamardinos
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fingolimod-induced decrease in heart rate may predict subsequent decreasing degree of lymphocytes.

Authors:  Tokunori Ikeda; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Mari Watari; Yukio Ando
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  MEGH: A parametric class of general hazard models for clustered survival data.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Rubio; Reza Drikvandi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.494

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.