Literature DB >> 21948039

Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads.

Alessandro Bistolfi1, Maurizio Crova, Federica Rosso, Paolo Titolo, Stefano Ventura, Giuseppe Massazza.   

Abstract

Dislocation is a common and important complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Larger femoral heads may reduce the risk of dislocation and improve the range of movement. The aim of this study was to compare the relative risk (RR) of dislocation during the first year after THA between implants with 28 mm and 36 mm femoral heads. 198 consecutive hips with 28 mm femoral head (Group-28) and 259 hips with 36 mm femoral head (Group-36) were studied. The patients were assessed preoperatively and periodically using the Harris hip score (HHS) and radiographic analysis. The relative risk (RR) of dislocation was calculated. The average HHS significantly improved from a preoperative baseline to the last follow-up at 82.1 months (28 mm) and 44.3 months (36 mm). No statistically significant differences were revealed between the two groups for HHS results and complications (p>0.05), but the difference in RR of dislocation within the first year between the two groups was 7.85 (95% CI: 1.34-46.03), p=0.046.Although dislocation is multifactorial in etiology, the two groups were homogenous for all principal contributing factors except the diameter of the femoral head. Therefore, the use of 36-mm heads can reduce the risk of dislocation following THA by a factor of 8 compared to conventional 28 mm heads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21948039     DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  16 in total

1.  [Larger heads compensate for an increased risk of THA dislocation in high-risk patients].

Authors:  D Zajonz; H Philipp; S Schleifenbaum; R Möbius; N Hammer; R Grunert; T Prietzel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Using nonlinear finite element models to analyse stress distribution during subluxation and torque required for dislocation of newly developed total hip structure after prosthetic impingement.

Authors:  Wei-Min Chi; Chien-Chung Lin; Ying-Jui Ho; Hsiao-Che Lin; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using 36 mm Femoral Heads on 1st Generation Highly Cross Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less with Minimum Five Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Won-Kee Choi; Myung-Rae Cho; Hee-Soo Kim; Jun-Ho Nam; Seung-Bum Chae
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

4.  Modular cementless cup for total hip arthroplasty: results at 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Federica Rosso; Stefano Ventura; Francesco Lagalla; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-01-06

5.  Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Kay; Derek Klavas; Varan Haghshenas; Mimi Phan; Daniel Le
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Inari Kostensalo; Mika Junnila; Petri Virolainen; Ville Remes; Markus Matilainen; Tero Vahlberg; Pekka Pulkkinen; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery.

Authors:  Einar Amlie; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Valborg Baste; Lars Nordsletten; Oystein Hovik; Sigbjorn Dimmen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Risk of dislocation using large- vs. small-diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Thorsten M Seyler; D Alex Stroh; Kimona Issa; Michael Akbar; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-05

9.  The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Rüdiger J Weiss; André Stark; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Head size and dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Somesh P Singh; Haresh P Bhalodiya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.