Literature DB >> 21947496

Well-informed foraging: damage-released chemical cues of injured prey signal quality and size to predators.

Oona M Lonnstedt1, Mark I McCormick, Douglas P Chivers.   

Abstract

Predators use a variety of information sources to locate potential prey, and likewise prey animals use numerous sources of information to detect and avoid becoming the meal of a potential predator. In freshwater environments, chemosensory cues often play a crucial role in such predator/prey interactions. The importance of chemosensory information to teleost fish in marine environments is not well understood. Here, we tested whether coral reef fish predators are attracted to damage-released chemical cues from already wounded prey in order to find patches of prey and minimize their own costs of obtaining food. Furthermore, we tested if these chemical cues would convey information about status of the prey. Using y-maze experiments, we found that predatory dottybacks, Pseudochromis fuscus, were more attracted to skin extracts of damselfish, Pomacentrus amboinensis, prey that were in good condition compared to prey in poor body condition. Moreover, in both the laboratory and field, we found that predators could differentiate between skin extracts from prey based on prey size, showing a greater attraction to extracts made from prey that were the appropriate size to consume. This suggests that predators are not attracted to any general substance released from an injured prey fish instead being capable of detecting and distinguishing relatively small differences in the chemical composition of the skin of their prey. These results have implications for understanding predator foraging strategies and highlights that chemical cues play a complex role in predator-prey interactions in marine fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947496     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2116-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Distress calls may honestly signal bird quality to predators.

Authors:  Paola Laiolo; José L Tella; Martina Carrete; David Serrano; Guillermo López
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The use of odors at different spatial scales: comparing birds with fish.

Authors:  Jennifer L DeBose; Gabrielle A Nevitt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  The chemistry of eavesdropping, alarm, and deceit.

Authors:  M K Stowe; T C Turlings; J H Loughrin; W J Lewis; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Marine chemical ecology: chemical signals and cues structure marine populations, communities, and ecosystems.

Authors:  Mark E Hay
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2009

5.  Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population.

Authors:  Joanne S Beukers; Geoffrey P Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do fish sniff? A new mechanism of olfactory sampling in pleuronectid flounders.

Authors:  G A Nevitt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.312

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Damsel in distress: captured damselfish prey emit chemical cues that attract secondary predators and improve escape chances.

Authors:  Oona M Lönnstedt; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Algae associated with coral degradation affects risk assessment in coral reef fishes.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Randall P Barry; Bridie J M Allan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Coral reef fish predator maintains olfactory acuity in degraded coral habitats.

Authors:  Michael Natt; Oona M Lönnstedt; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Interspecific differences in how habitat degradation affects escape response.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Bridie J M Allan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Increased juvenile predation is not associated with evolved differences in adult brain size in Trinidadian killifish (Rivulus hartii).

Authors:  Shannon M Beston; Whitnee Broyles; Matthew R Walsh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Stream grazers determine their crawling direction on the basis of chemical and particulate microalgal cues.

Authors:  Izumi Katano; Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Perch, Perca fluviatilis show a directional preference for, but do not increase attacks toward, prey in response to water-borne cortisol.

Authors:  Lindsay J Henderson; Mary R Ryan; Hannah M Rowland
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.