Literature DB >> 18566861

The use of odors at different spatial scales: comparing birds with fish.

Jennifer L DeBose1, Gabrielle A Nevitt.   

Abstract

Salmon travel hundreds of kilometers of open ocean and meandering rivers to return to their natal stream to spawn; procellariiform seabirds soar over thousands of kilometers of the ocean's surface searching for foraging opportunities and accurately return to their nesting islands. These large-scale olfactory-guided behaviors are among the most dramatic examples of animal navigation ever described. At much closer ranges, the sense of smell can be used for behaviors as diverse as tracking prey, nest location, and mate selection. Both fish and birds face similar problems interpreting olfactory information in fluid mediums where odors are dispersed as filamentous patches. Similar to insects, which have served as model organisms for investigating olfactory related behaviors, the few fish and bird species that have been studied tend to use olfactory information in conjunction with other sensory modalities. Similar to insects, fish and birds also employ oscillatory or cross-stream movement as sampling mechanisms. This review compares and contrasts the use of odors by fish and birds over a range of spatial scales that span from thousands of kilometers to less than a meter. In so doing, we identify behavioral similarities and new questions that need to be addressed regarding the olfactory ecology of these diverse groups of organisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566861     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9493-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  42 in total

1.  Olfactory sensory input increases gill ventilation in male round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) during exposure to steroids.

Authors:  Rachelle M Belanger; Lynda D Corkum; Weiming Li; Barbara S Zielinski
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Anatomical evidence for olfactory function in some species of birds.

Authors:  B G BANG
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1960-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Putative steroidal pheromones in the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus: olfactory and behavioral responses.

Authors:  C A Murphy; N E Stacey; L D Corkum
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Partner-specific odor recognition in an Antarctic seabird.

Authors:  Francesco Bonadonna; Gabrielle A Nevitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The influence of developmental environment on the evolution of olfactory foraging behaviour in procellariiform seabirds.

Authors:  R W VAN Buskirk; G A Nevitt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Lacustrine sockeye salmon return straight to their natal area from open water using both visual and olfactory cues.

Authors:  H Ueda; M Kaeriyama; K Mukasa; A Urano; H Kudo; T Shoji; Y Tokumitsu; K Yamauchi; K Kurihara
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Olfaction and the homing ability of pigeons in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  V P Bingman; S Benvenuti
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1996-10-15

8.  Functional anatomy of the olfactory system in 23 orders of birds.

Authors:  B G Bang
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1971

9.  Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; David Pinaud; Frédéric Pawlowski; Charles-André Bost
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Dimethylsulfoniopropionate as a foraging cue for reef fishes.

Authors:  Jennifer L DeBose; Sean C Lema; Gabrielle A Nevitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  27 in total

1.  Well-informed foraging: damage-released chemical cues of injured prey signal quality and size to predators.

Authors:  Oona M Lonnstedt; Mark I McCormick; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  From chemotaxis to the cognitive map: the function of olfaction.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Physiological, behavioral, and ecological aspects of migration in reptiles.

Authors:  Amanda Southwood; Larisa Avens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Odour cues from suitors' nests determine mating success in a fish.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Mycosporine-like amino acids are multifunctional molecules in sea hares and their marine community.

Authors:  Cynthia E Kicklighter; Michiya Kamio; Linh Nguyen; Markus W Germann; Charles D Derby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Marine chemical ecology: chemical signals and cues structure marine populations, communities, and ecosystems.

Authors:  Mark E Hay
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2009

7.  A novel pathway producing dimethylsulphide in bacteria is widespread in soil environments.

Authors:  O Carrión; A R J Curson; D Kumaresan; Y Fu; A S Lang; E Mercadé; J D Todd
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Plant defences on land and in water: why are they so different?

Authors:  Geerat J Vermeij
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Evidence that dimethyl sulfide facilitates a tritrophic mutualism between marine primary producers and top predators.

Authors:  Matthew S Savoca; Gabrielle A Nevitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Catabolism of dimethylsulphoniopropionate: microorganisms, enzymes and genes.

Authors:  Andrew R J Curson; Jonathan D Todd; Matthew J Sullivan; Andrew W B Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 60.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.