Literature DB >> 21945341

Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device.

Stephen Sprigle1, Michelle Nemeth, Anita Gajjala.   

Abstract

A variety of wound measurement techniques are available to clinicians. Options range from relatively simple and inexpensive to complex, expensive devices. An iterative design approach was used to evaluate and improve performance and clinical utility of a new wound measurement device (WMD). The design was based upon a commercially available Smartphone. Accuracy was assessed using bench testing and reliability of area measurements was determined using multiple evaluators. Clinical utility was investigated by deploying the WMD during wound rounds in a rehabilitation hospital. Accuracy testing revealed an average error <2% at 0° or skew and an average error of 4.28% at 10° of skew. The intra-rater reliability exceeded 0.975 for all raters and inter-rater reliability was 0.966. Clinical utility testing provided the opportunity to address several usability concerns including the software interface and computation times. The accuracy and reliability of a new, non-contact wound measurement device exceeded that of other manual techniques and were, at least, equivocal to other computer-based technologies. Some limitations of using a Smartphone were identified by the clinicians that can be addressed by the more advanced processing power of newer technology. Overall, the WMD was shown to have the potential as a useful clinical tool.
Copyright © 2011 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945341     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2011.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  7 in total

Review 1.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Non-Invasive Multimodal Imaging in Chronic Wound Monitoring: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rashmi Mukherjee; Suman Tewary; Aurobinda Routray
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Assessment of the Size of the Surgical Site in Minimally Invasive Hip Surgery.

Authors:  David Putzer; Matthias Haselbacher; Sebastian Klug; Michael Nogler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Quality of measurements of acute surgical and traumatic wounds using a digital wound-analysing tool.

Authors:  Dymmie Lc Landa; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Ewout W Steyerberg; Steven Er Hovius
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Patient perception of wound photography.

Authors:  Sheila C Wang; John Ae Anderson; Duncan Vb Jones; Robyn Evans
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Wound Size Imaging: Ready for Smart Assessment and Monitoring.

Authors:  Yves Lucas; Rania Niri; Sylvie Treuillet; Hassan Douzi; Benjamin Castaneda
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Advances in non-invasive biosensing measures to monitor wound healing progression.

Authors:  Walker D Short; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Benjamin W Padon; Umang M Parikh; Daniel Colchado; Hima Vangapandu; Shayan Shams; Taiyun Chi; Jangwook P Jung; Swathi Balaji
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.