Literature DB >> 25124729

Quality of measurements of acute surgical and traumatic wounds using a digital wound-analysing tool.

Dymmie Lc Landa1, Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck2,3, Ewout W Steyerberg3, Steven Er Hovius2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of measurements using a wound-analysing tool and their interpretability. Wound surface areas and tissue types, such as granulation, slough and necrosis, in twenty digital photographs were measured using a specific software program. The ratio of these tissue types in a wound was calculated using a wound profile. We calculated the intraclass coefficient or κ for reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). The inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0·99 for surface area, 0·76 for granulation, 0·67 for slough and 0·22 for necrosis. The profiles gave an overall κ of 0·16. For test-retest reliability, the ICC was 0·99 for surface area, 0·81 for granulation, 0·80 for slough and 0·97 for necrosis. The agreement of the applied profiles in the test-retest was 66% (40-100). SEM and SDC for surface area were 0·10/0·27; for granulation, 6·88/19·08; for slough, 7·17/19·87; and for necrosis, 0·35/0·98, respectively. Measuring wound surface area and tissue types by means of digital photo analysis is a reliable and applicable method for monitoring wound healing in acute wounds in daily practice as well as in research.
© 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital wound photographs; Interpretability and reliability; Measurement; Surface area and tissue types; Surgical wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25124729      PMCID: PMC7949804          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  24 in total

Review 1.  Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing?

Authors:  M Flanagan
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 2.  MEASURE: A proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment.

Authors:  David H Keast; C Keith Bowering; A Wayne Evans; Gerald L Mackean; Catherine Burrows; Lincoln D'Souza
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen W Wyrwich; Monika Bullinger; Neil Aaronson; Ron D Hays; Donald L Patrick; Tara Symonds
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Measuring clinically meaningful change following mental health treatment.

Authors:  Susan V Eisen; Gayatri Ranganathan; Pradipta Seal; Avron Spiro
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 5.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Image processing in the study of wound healing.

Authors:  J R Mekkes; W Westerhof
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.541

7.  Methods for assessing change in ulcer status.

Authors:  K G Harding
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Wound care: how to use the red-yellow-black system.

Authors:  D Krasner
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.220

Review 9.  Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments.

Authors:  M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Efficacy and prognostic value of simple wound measurements.

Authors:  J Kantor; D J Margolis
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1998-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Technological Advances in Clinical Definition and Surveillance Methodology for Surgical Site Infection Incorporating Surgical Site Imaging and Patient-Generated Health Data.

Authors:  Robert G Sawyer; Heather L Evans; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.150

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.