| Literature DB >> 36213059 |
Walker D Short1, Oluyinka O Olutoye1, Benjamin W Padon1, Umang M Parikh1, Daniel Colchado1, Hima Vangapandu1, Shayan Shams2,3, Taiyun Chi4, Jangwook P Jung5, Swathi Balaji1.
Abstract
Impaired wound healing is a significant financial and medical burden. The synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in a new wound is a dynamic process that is constantly changing and adapting to the biochemical and biomechanical signaling from the extracellular microenvironments of the wound. This drives either a regenerative or fibrotic and scar-forming healing outcome. Disruptions in ECM deposition, structure, and composition lead to impaired healing in diseased states, such as in diabetes. Valid measures of the principal determinants of successful ECM deposition and wound healing include lack of bacterial contamination, good tissue perfusion, and reduced mechanical injury and strain. These measures are used by wound-care providers to intervene upon the healing wound to steer healing toward a more functional phenotype with improved structural integrity and healing outcomes and to prevent adverse wound developments. In this review, we discuss bioengineering advances in 1) non-invasive detection of biologic and physiologic factors of the healing wound, 2) visualizing and modeling the ECM, and 3) computational tools that efficiently evaluate the complex data acquired from the wounds based on basic science, preclinical, translational and clinical studies, that would allow us to prognosticate healing outcomes and intervene effectively. We focus on bioelectronics and biologic interfaces of the sensors and actuators for real time biosensing and actuation of the tissues. We also discuss high-resolution, advanced imaging techniques, which go beyond traditional confocal and fluorescence microscopy to visualize microscopic details of the composition of the wound matrix, linearity of collagen, and live tracking of components within the wound microenvironment. Computational modeling of the wound matrix, including partial differential equation datasets as well as machine learning models that can serve as powerful tools for physicians to guide their decision-making process are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: bioelectronics; biofilm; biosensor; extracellular matrix (ECM); impaired wound healing; machine learning; perfusion; wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36213059 PMCID: PMC9539744 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.952198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Phases of wound healing. (A) Wound healing progresses through four phases including hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. (B) Representative H&E staining of wounds in the inflammation stage demonstrating poor granulation tissue formation in an infected wound. Arrows represent wound edge. Illustration created using Biorender.com.
FIGURE 2Schematic of dressing-impregnated microchip with simultaneous biosensing and medication delivery capabilities.
FIGURE 3Optical coherence tomography and elastography. (A) Schematic of optical coherence tomography. (B) Set up for Optical Coherence Elastography. Red box designates location of sample/subject of interest. (C) Elastographic map of mouse skin with scar denoted within white dotted lines. (D) Cross section of normal skin using OCE. (E) Cross section of scar using OCE. Illustration generated using Biorender.com. OCE images courtesy of Dr. Kirill Larin Lab at the University of Houston.
Advantages and disadvantages of partial differential equation systems and deep learning systems.
| Non-linear partial differential equations system | Deep neural network/Deep learning system | |
|---|---|---|
| Advantages | Can see and control input variables | Hierarchical feature learning ability transforming high-dimensional data into low-dimensional latent features |
| Ability to model highly complex systems as a function of specific input variables | Ability of integrating multimodal data | |
| Ability to handle noisy data | ||
| Disadvantages | Labor and computationally intensive | Computationally expensive |
| Difficult to change model given new data | Less interpretability | |
| Selected Readings |
|
|
|
|
|
FIGURE 4Illustration of potential machine learning applications to wound healing. (A) Schematic of machine learning vs. deep neural network use to improve wound healing outcomes. (B) Machine learning to modulate interventions to improve wound healing. Illustration created using Biorender.com.