Literature DB >> 21945094

PIF1 disruption or NBS1 hypomorphism does not affect chromosome healing or fusion resulting from double-strand breaks near telomeres in murine embryonic stem cells.

Gloria E Reynolds1, Qing Gao, Douglas Miller, Bryan E Snow, Lea A Harrington, John P Murnane.   

Abstract

Telomerase serves to maintain telomeric repeat sequences at the ends of chromosomes. However, telomerase can also add telomeric repeat sequences at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a process called chromosome healing. Here, we employed a method of inducing DSBs near telomeres to query the role of two proteins, PIF1 and NBS1, in chromosome healing in mammalian cells. PIF1 was investigated because the PIF1 homolog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits chromosome healing, as shown by a 1000-fold increase in chromosome in PIF1-deficient cells. NBS1 was investigated because the functional homolog of NBS1 in S. cerevisiae, Xrs2, is part of the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex that is required for chromosome healing due to its role in the processing of DSBs and recruitment of telomerase. We found that disruption of mPif1 had no detectable effect on the frequency of chromosome healing at DSBs near telomeres in murine embryonic stem cells. Moreover, the Nbs1(ΔB) hypomorph, which is defective in the processing of DSBs, also had no detectable effect on the frequency of chromosome healing, DNA degradation, or gross chromosome rearrangements (GCRs) that result from telomeric DSBs. Although we cannot rule out small changes in chromosome healing using this system, it is clear from our results that knockout of PIF1 or the Nbs1(ΔB) hypomorph does not result in large differences in chromosome healing in murine cells. These results represent the first genetic assessment of the role of these proteins in chromosome healing in mammals, and suggest that murine cells have evolved mechanisms to ensure the functional redundancy of Pif1 or Nbs1 in the regulation of chromosome healing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945094      PMCID: PMC3208378          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  58 in total

1.  Chromosome healing in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  C N Sprung; G E Reynolds; M Jasin; J P Murnane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  New mammalian cellular systems to study mutations introduced at the break site by non-homologous end-joining.

Authors:  Paola Rebuzzini; Lela Khoriauli; Claus M Azzalin; Elisa Magnani; Chiara Mondello; Elena Giulotto
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-05-02

3.  Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  C Richardson; M E Moynahan; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The relationship between chromosome structure and function at a human telomeric region.

Authors:  J Flint; K Thomas; G Micklem; H Raynham; K Clark; N A Doggett; A King; D R Higgs
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The loss of a single telomere can result in instability of multiple chromosomes in a human tumor cell line.

Authors:  Laure Sabatier; Michelle Ricoul; Géraldine Pottier; John P Murnane
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Molecular characterization of a 130-kb terminal microdeletion at 22q in a child with mild mental retardation.

Authors:  A C Wong; Y Ning; J Flint; K Clark; J P Dumanski; D H Ledbetter; H E McDermid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Selection for spontaneous null mutations in a chromosomally-integrated HSV-1 thymidine kinase gene yields deletions and a mutation caused by intragenic illegitimate recombination.

Authors:  J J Brisebois; M S DuBow
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  A new retroviral vector for detecting mutations and chromosomal instability in mammalian cells.

Authors:  S Murata; T Matsuzaki; S Takai; H Yaoita; M Noda
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  New telomeres in yeast are initiated with a highly selected subset of TG1-3 repeats.

Authors:  K M Kramer; J E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Positional cloning of ZNF217 and NABC1: genes amplified at 20q13.2 and overexpressed in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  C Collins; J M Rommens; D Kowbel; T Godfrey; M Tanner; S I Hwang; D Polikoff; G Nonet; J Cochran; K Myambo; K E Jay; J Froula; T Cloutier; W L Kuo; P Yaswen; S Dairkee; J Giovanola; G B Hutchinson; J Isola; O P Kallioniemi; M Palazzolo; C Martin; C Ericsson; D Pinkel; D Albertson; W B Li; J W Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of telomere addition at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Cyril Ribeyre; David Shore
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Getting it done at the ends: Pif1 family DNA helicases and telomeres.

Authors:  Carly L Geronimo; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-16

3.  The TPR-containing domain within Est1 homologs exhibits species-specific roles in telomerase interaction and telomere length homeostasis.

Authors:  David C F Sealey; Aleksandar D Kostic; Catherine LeBel; Fiona Pryde; Lea Harrington
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.946

4.  Mechanisms of telomere loss and their consequences for chromosome instability.

Authors:  Keiko Muraki; Kristine Nyhan; Limei Han; John P Murnane
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.