| Literature DB >> 21943239 |
Rani Kanthan1, Jenna-Lynn B Senger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-reflection and reflective practice are increasingly considered as essential attributes of competent professionals functioning in complex and ever-changing healthcare systems of the 21st century. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of students' awareness and understanding of the reflective process and the meaning of 'self-reflection' within the contextual framework of their learning environment in the first-year of their medical/dental education. We endorse that the introduction of such explicit educational tasks at this early stage enhances and promotes students' awareness, understanding, and proficiency of this skill in their continuing life-long health professional learning.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21943239 PMCID: PMC3187722 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-67
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Reflective Rubric
| Category | Level 5 | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skillfully details precise accounts of important events | Several events are accurately logged in detail | Attempts to outline in some detail one activity | Generally describes the entire scope of the class without specific detail | Does not select and summarize activities that have transpired | ||
| Demonstrates in depth understanding of skills | Demonstrates a thoughtful awareness of skills | Demonstrates a rudimentary awareness of some skills practiced | Demonstrates a limited awareness of few skills/strategies practiced throughout the year | Demonstrates little to no awareness of skills targeted | ||
| Demonstrates ability to list all strengths and weaknesses and provide a plan for amelioration | Demonstrates ability to list some strengths and weaknesses | Demonstrates ability to list at least one strength and one weakness | Demonstrates ability to recognize personal strengths but not weakness | Does not demonstrate ability to see personal strengths or weaknesses | ||
| A concise recognition of learning requirements and ways to facilitate future learning is identified | Recognizes a preferred learning style and compares it to teaching style employed in class | Recognizes preferred learning style | Indicates a preference of one activity from class over another | No evidence of recognition is made | ||
| Connections are explored in great precision and detail | Connections are made and casually discussed | Connections are recognized but are ineffective | Limited connections to nonspecific, theoretical aspects of life are discussed | No evidence of connections are made | ||
| Writing reveals a well-developed emotional and personalized relationship to the specific context, enhanced with specific examples | Writing reveals a strong connection between the event and the writer accompanied by few general reflections | Both general and personal insight are present, further exploration is required | Generalizations used to explore topics of discussion with 1-2 references to self | Employs no 'self' into writing; uses only obvious statements without contextual references | ||
| Explicit details of precise aspects of course load and relates them to specific anticipatory future events | Recognition of few precise important facets of course load expanded to broad future goals | Generalized discussion of possible future implications is discussed is some detail | Future applications of an aspect of the course are mentioned in passing without detail | No future applications of class materials are discussed | ||
Figure 1This is a graphic representation of the qualitative analysis of the students' self-reflective documents. The y-axis shows the percentage of student responses in the various levels of reflection to the various categories as listed on the x-axis. Level 1 indicates a limited reflection-awareness while level 5 represents a well-reflected response. The categories on the x-axis are as follows: Category A: Significant events from course that led to reflection. Category B: Information/Skills acquired from course. Category C: Personal abilities. Category D: Personal learning style. Category E: Connections between the course and past life experiences. Category F: Oneself in relation to the situation (emotions, values, beliefs, etc.).