D T Sobral1. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medicine C.P. 15-3031, 70910-900 Brasilia, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: How do students reflect as they strive for some control of learning early in their clinical activities? The purpose of this study was to examine the reflection-in-learning profile of medical students as they started their clinical apprenticeship. METHODS: A measure of reflection-in-learning was used to appraise the level and direction of change of reflection in relation to a course experience. The study involved 103 medical students of both sexes who were beginning clinical activities. Assessments of self-regulation of learning, of the meaningfulness of the learning experience, and of diagnostic thinking were also obtained. RESULTS: The results showed that 81% of the students had an increase in scores for reflection-in-learning between the beginning and the end of a course. At the end of the course, the level of reflection-in-learning was significantly associated with self-perceived competence for self-regulated learning and with the meaningfulness of the learning experience. In the following term, students who had high reflection-in-learning scores at the end of the course had higher grade-point averages and greater self-reported diagnostic ability in comparison with those with low scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was some evidence of an improved quality of reflection as the students strive for some control of learning. Overall, the findings support the idea that a greater effort at reflection is associated with a more positive learning experience. They also suggest that reflection-in-learning is related to readiness for self-regulation of learning and may be conducive to enhanced diagnostic ability. In conclusion, measuring reflection-in-learning may be a useful tool in the appraisal of medical students' learning profiles.
INTRODUCTION: How do students reflect as they strive for some control of learning early in their clinical activities? The purpose of this study was to examine the reflection-in-learning profile of medical students as they started their clinical apprenticeship. METHODS: A measure of reflection-in-learning was used to appraise the level and direction of change of reflection in relation to a course experience. The study involved 103 medical students of both sexes who were beginning clinical activities. Assessments of self-regulation of learning, of the meaningfulness of the learning experience, and of diagnostic thinking were also obtained. RESULTS: The results showed that 81% of the students had an increase in scores for reflection-in-learning between the beginning and the end of a course. At the end of the course, the level of reflection-in-learning was significantly associated with self-perceived competence for self-regulated learning and with the meaningfulness of the learning experience. In the following term, students who had high reflection-in-learning scores at the end of the course had higher grade-point averages and greater self-reported diagnostic ability in comparison with those with low scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was some evidence of an improved quality of reflection as the students strive for some control of learning. Overall, the findings support the idea that a greater effort at reflection is associated with a more positive learning experience. They also suggest that reflection-in-learning is related to readiness for self-regulation of learning and may be conducive to enhanced diagnostic ability. In conclusion, measuring reflection-in-learning may be a useful tool in the appraisal of medical students' learning profiles.
Authors: Sebastiaan Koole; Tim Dornan; Leen Aper; Albert Scherpbier; Martin Valcke; Janke Cohen-Schotanus; Anselme Derese Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Caitlin D Hanlon; Emily M Frosch; Robert B Shochet; Simon J Buckingham Shum; Andrew Gibson; Harry R Goldberg Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2020-10-27
Authors: Sebastiaan Koole; Tim Dornan; Leen Aper; Albert Scherpbier; Martin Valcke; Janke Cohen-Schotanus; Anselme Derese Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 2.463