Literature DB >> 21942761

Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model.

Robert A Marino1, Thomas P Trappenberg, Michael Dorris, Douglas P Munoz.   

Abstract

During natural vision, eye movements are dynamically controlled by the combinations of goal-related top-down (TD) and stimulus-related bottom-up (BU) neural signals that map onto objects or locations of interest in the visual world. In primates, both BU and TD signals converge in many areas of the brain, including the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SCi), a midbrain structure that contains a retinotopically coded map for saccades. How TD and BU signals combine or interact within the SCi map to influence saccades remains poorly understood and actively debated. It has been proposed that winner-take-all competition between these signals occurs dynamically within this map to determine the next location for gaze. Here, we examine how TD and BU signals interact spatially within an artificial two-dimensional dynamic winner-take-all neural field model of the SCi to influence saccadic RT (SRT). We measured point images (spatially organized population activity on the SC map) physiologically to inform the TD and BU model parameters. In this model, TD and BU signals interacted nonlinearly within the SCi map to influence SRT via changes to the (1) spatial size or extent of individual signals, (2) peak magnitude of individual signals, (3) total number of competing signals, and (4) the total spatial separation between signals in the visual field. This model reproduced previous behavioral studies of TD and BU influences on SRT and accounted for multiple inconsistencies between them. This is achieved by demonstrating how, under different experimental conditions, the spatial interactions of TD and BU signals can lead to either increases or decreases in SRT. Our results suggest that dynamic winner-take-all modeling with local excitation and distal inhibition in two dimensions accurately reflects both the physiological activity within the SCi map and the behavioral changes in SRT that result from BU and TD manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21942761     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

1.  Impact of response duration on multisensory integration.

Authors:  Dipanwita Ghose; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Suppressive interactions underlying visually evoked fixational saccades.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Ron Levy; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Spatial representations in the superior colliculus are modulated by competition among targets.

Authors:  Mario J Lintz; Jaclyn Essig; Joel Zylberberg; Gidon Felsen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.

Authors:  John Christie; Matthew D Hilchey; Ramesh Mishra; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18

10.  Dynamic interactions between visual working memory and saccade target selection.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner; Seongmin Hwang; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.