Literature DB >> 21940573

The negative appendectomy rate: who benefits from preoperative CT?

Emily M Webb1, Alexander Nguyen, Zhen J Wang, Joseph W Stengel, Antonio C Westphalen, Fergus V Coakley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to determine the negative appendectomy rates of patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT and to determine, more specifically, whether men benefit from preoperative CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 512 patients who had a nonincidental appendectomy between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2007. Pathology records were compared with a radiology records search to determine which patients underwent preoperative CT. Proportions of patients were compared between groups using the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Of 512 patients who had a nonincidental appendectomy, 465 (91%) underwent preoperative CT, and 47 (9%) underwent appendectomy only on the basis of clinical findings. Overall, 22 of 465 patients (4.7%) who underwent preoperative CT had a negative appendectomy compared with six of 47 patients who did not undergo preoperative imaging (negative appendectomy rate, 12.7%; p = 0.03). Among men, six of 237 (2.5%) with preoperative CT had a negative appendectomy, versus five of 42 without imaging (negative appendectomy rate, 11.9%; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The negative appendectomy rate was decreased for adult patients who underwent preoperative CT compared with patients who did not undergo preoperative imaging. Although most prior studies have suggested that CT is efficacious only in decreasing the negative appendectomy rate among women, we found that men benefit from CT as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940573     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

1.  Predictors of appendicitis on computed tomography among cases with borderline appendix size.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Eric W Olcott; Peter D Poullos; R Brooke Jeffrey; Matthew O Thompson; Jarrett Rosenberg; Lewis K Shin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-17

2.  Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.

Authors:  Juliane Liese; Thomas M Halbinger; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Christoph W Strey
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Histopathological correlations of appendectomies: a clinical audit of a single center.

Authors:  Ayodeji Oluwarotimi Omiyale; Samuel Adjepong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

5.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT findings of acute appendicitis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ji Ye Sim; Hyuk Jung Kim; Jae Woo Yeon; Byoung Sun Suh; Ki Ho Kim; Young Rock Ha; So Ya Paik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Rafael Alfonso; Puneet Bhargava; Carlos Cuevas; Manjiri K Dighe; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

Authors:  Matthew G R Allaway; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Xinhong Song; Mingqi Shi; Wei Liu; Yansong Ge; Peiyuan Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.