Literature DB >> 26207247

Histopathological correlations of appendectomies: a clinical audit of a single center.

Ayodeji Oluwarotimi Omiyale1, Samuel Adjepong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is a common presentation in surgical assessment units and appendectomy accounts for a large number of emergency operations in the UK. Histopathological examination of the appendectomy specimens are routinely carried out. The aim of this study is to correlate the histological findings of appendectomy specimens with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 238 appendectomies carried out in a single UK center between January and December 2013. The Histopathology reports of appendectomy specimens were retrieved.
RESULTS: A total of 238 appendectomies were performed during the study period. The mean age of the patients was 32 years (range, 7-81 years). Adult patients (>16 years) represented 79.4% of the study population. The female sex accounted for 46.6% of all the patients. Of the 238 resected appendix, 211 (88.7%) had histopathology findings consistent with appendicitis. Approximately 1.7% of the 238 specimens were abnormal pathologies other than inflammation of the appendix. The negative appendectomy (normal appendix on histology) rate was 11.3%. The female sex accounted for 59.1% of the negative appendectomies. Adults (>16 years) represented 77.8% of the negative appendectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed high rates of negative appendectomy in the female sex can be reduced by utilizing combined clinical assessment and diagnostic imaging modalities. The findings of abnormal pathologies on histopathological examination of the appendix which could potentially impact on the management of the patients justify the current practice of routine histopathological examination of resected appendix.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendectomy specimens; histopathological review; negative appendectomy rates (NARs)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26207247      PMCID: PMC4481363          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.05.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  28 in total

1.  Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Shiva A Seetahal; Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro; Trishanna C Sookdeo; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Wendy R Greene; Wayne Frederick; Edward E Cornwell; David C Chang; Suryanarayana M Siram
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases.

Authors:  Slim Charfi; Ahmad Sellami; Abdellatif Affes; Khalil Yaïch; Rafik Mzali; Tahya Sellami Boudawara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Implications of removing a normal appendix.

Authors:  C L Bijnen; W T Van Den Broek; A B Bijnen; P De Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Geraint T Williams; Brian I Rees
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  The diagnostic value of white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin in acute appendicitis and its complications.

Authors:  I G Panagiotopoulou; D Parashar; R Lin; S Antonowicz; A D Wells; F M Bajwa; B Krijgsman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H A Swank; E J Eshuis; D T Ubbink; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 7.  Review of the histopathological findings in appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Nigerians.

Authors:  O S Ojo; S C Udeh; W O Odesanmi
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1991-08

8.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Alun E Jones; Alexander W Phillips; John R Jarvis; Kevin Sargen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  J G Mariadason; W N Wang; M K Wallack; A Belmonte; H Matari
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens.

Authors:  Osama Elfaedy; Mohamed Benkhadoura; Akrem Elshaikhy; Khaled Elgazwi
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-09-23

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system relative to histopathological diagnosis for acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab Naeem; Muhammad Amir Jamil; Muhammad Imran Anwar; Hassan Raza; Ali Asad; Hashaam Jamil; Muhammad Junaid Tahir; Jharna Bai; Tabssum Mohamad Ejaz Chauhan; Muhammad Sohaib Asghar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Histopathological examination of cases with acute appendicitis, A retrospective study at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mai Kadi; Ali Nasr; Alaa A Shabkah; Rothana Alnahari; Afnan Alhawi; Romaysaa Alyamani; Abdulaziz M Saleem
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 4.  Routine Histopathological Evaluation After Appendectomy: Is It Necessary? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kashish Malhotra; Ashvind Bawa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.