Literature DB >> 21939802

Impact of guideline implementation by a fracture nurse on subsequent fractures and mortality in patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures.

Kirsten M B Huntjens1, Tineke C M van Geel, Piet P Geusens, Bjorn Winkens, Paul Willems, Joop van den Bergh, Peter R G Brink, Svenhjalmar van Helden.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Systematic implementation of guidelines in patients presenting with a fracture increases identification of patients at high risk for subsequent fractures and contributes to a decreased fracture risk. Its effect on prevention of subsequent fractures and on mortality has not been documented. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the implementation of specific guidelines on the risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in patients presenting with a non-vertebral fracture (NVF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Before-after impact analysis in consecutive patients older than 50 years who were admitted to the hospital with a NVF during 2 periods: pre-intervention group (n = 1,920, enrolled in 1999-2001) and intervention group (n = 1,335, enrolled in 2004-2006). The intervention consisted of a dedicated fracture nurse who systematically offered fracture risk evaluation and treatment according to available guidelines. The 2-year absolute risk (AR) and hazard ratio's (HR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)) of subsequent NVFs and mortality were analysed between both groups after adjustment for age, sex and baseline fracture location by multivariable Cox regression and by intention-to-treat.
RESULTS: The AR of subsequent fracture was 9.9% before and 6.7% after intervention, indicating a decrease of 35% in the risk of subsequent fracture (HR 0.65; CI: 0.51-0.84, after adjustment for age, sex and baseline fracture location) and 17.9% and 11.6%, respectively, for subsequent mortality, indicating a decrease of 33% in the risk of subsequent mortality (HR: 0.67; CI: 0.55-0.81, after adjustment for age, sex and baseline fracture location).
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic implementation of guidelines for fracture prevention by a dedicated fracture nurse immediately after a NVF is associated with a significant reduction of the 2-year risk of subsequent NVF and mortality.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939802     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  19 in total

Review 1.  Fracture liaison services: do they reduce fracture rates?

Authors:  Irma J A de Bruin; Caroline E Wyers; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet P M M Geusens
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Amiens University Hospital's fracture liaison service between January 2010 and December 2011.

Authors:  N Dehamchia-Rehailia; D Ursu; I Henry-Desailly; P Fardellone; J Paccou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.

Authors:  C-H Wu; C-H Chen; P-H Chen; J-J Yang; P-C Chang; T-C Huang; S Bagga; Y Sharma; R-M Lin; D-C Chan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Multiple simultaneous fractures are associated with higher all-cause mortality: results from a province-wide fracture liaison service.

Authors:  R Sujic; J Luo; D E Beaton; E R Bogoch; J E M Sale; S Jaglal; R Jain; M Mamdani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Evaluation of a "Just-in-Time" Nurse Consultation on Bone Health: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Douglas W Roblin; David Zelman; Sally Plummer; Brandi E Robinson; Yiyue Lou; Stephanie W Edmonds; Fredric D Wolinsky; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

Review 6.  Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Which patients are at risk for not receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture?: An ACS NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Adam M Gordon; Azeem Tariq Malik; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-20

Review 8.  The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Li; M Hiligsmann; A Boonen; M M van Oostwaard; R T A L de Bot; C E Wyers; S P G Bours; J P van den Bergh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The role of the combination of bone and fall related risk factors on short-term subsequent fracture risk and mortality.

Authors:  Kirsten M B Huntjens; Tineke A C M van Geel; Svenhjalmar van Helden; Joop van den Bergh; Paul Willems; Bjorn Winkens; Piet P Geusens; Peter R G Brink
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Models of care for osteoporosis: A systematic scoping review of efficacy and implementation characteristics.

Authors:  Alicia R Jones; Madhuni Herath; Peter R Ebeling; Helena Teede; Amanda J Vincent
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.