| Literature DB >> 21936949 |
Pembe Issamou Mayengue1, Mathieu Ndounga, Freddy Vladimir Malonga, Michel Bitemo, Francine Ntoumi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The characterization of malaria parasite populations circulating in an area is part of site characterization, as a basis for evaluating the impact of malaria interventions on genetic diversity, parasite species, and multiplicity of infection. The present study was aimed at analysing genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface proteins 1 and 2 (MSP-1 and MSP-2) and to determine the multiplicity of infection in clinical isolates collected from children living in the Southern district of Brazzaville in the Republic of Congo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21936949 PMCID: PMC3195763 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Characteristics of individuals with uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria from Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| Characteristics of patients | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of Male/Female | 125 | 68/57 |
| Mean age (years) | 125 | 8 (0.7-54) |
| Mean parasite density (parasites/μl) | 125 | 62,170 (830-914,000) |
| Multiplicity of | 125 | 2.2 |
| Polyclonal infections (%) | 104 | 83 |
Figure 1Prevalence of . Alleles of the msp-1 gene were classified by fragment length (in base pairs) resulting from PCR amplifications with allele specific primers.
Distribution of msp1 and msp2 detected allelic families and corresponding mean parasite densities in Congolese P.falciparum isolates
| Mean Parasite Densities | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MSP1 | MSP2 | ||
| FC27 | 3D7 | ||
| K1 | 65273 | 58899 | |
| Mad20 | 89818 | 76886 | |
| RO33 | 60116 | 57269 | |
In bold are presented multiclonal infections.
Figure 2Prevalence of different .
Profile of multiple infections according to the parasite densities (P.falciparum parasites/μl of blood)
| Multiplicity of Infection | Mean Parasite Densities |
|---|---|
| 30,490 | |
| 64,979 | |
| 70,216 | |
| 90,632 | |
| 45,390 | |
| 62,170 |
Figure 3Relation between multiplicity of .
Figure 4Relation between mean geometric parasite density and the multiplicity of .