Literature DB >> 21934137

SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.

M Shel Swenson1, Rahul Suri, C Randal Linder, Tandy Warnow.   

Abstract

Many research groups are estimating trees containing anywhere from a few thousands to hundreds of thousands of species, toward the eventual goal of the estimation of a Tree of Life, containing perhaps as many as several million leaves. These phylogenetic estimations present enormous computational challenges, and current computational methods are likely to fail to run even on data sets in the low end of this range. One approach to estimate a large species tree is to use phylogenetic estimation methods (such as maximum likelihood) on a supermatrix produced by concatenating multiple sequence alignments for a collection of markers; however, the most accurate of these phylogenetic estimation methods are extremely computationally intensive for data sets with more than a few thousand sequences. Supertree methods, which assemble phylogenetic trees from a collection of trees on subsets of the taxa, are important tools for phylogeny estimation where phylogenetic analyses based upon maximum likelihood (ML) are infeasible. In this paper, we introduce SuperFine, a meta-method that utilizes a novel two-step procedure in order to improve the accuracy and scalability of supertree methods. Our study, using both simulated and empirical data, shows that SuperFine-boosted supertree methods produce more accurate trees than standard supertree methods, and run quickly on very large data sets with thousands of sequences. Furthermore, SuperFine-boosted matrix representation with parsimony (MRP, the most well-known supertree method) approaches the accuracy of ML methods on supermatrix data sets under realistic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21934137     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  18 in total

1.  Large-scale multiple sequence alignment and tree estimation using SATé.

Authors:  Kevin Liu; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

2.  Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants.

Authors:  Norman J Wickett; Siavash Mirarab; Nam Nguyen; Tandy Warnow; Eric Carpenter; Naim Matasci; Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam; Michael S Barker; J Gordon Burleigh; Matthew A Gitzendanner; Brad R Ruhfel; Eric Wafula; Joshua P Der; Sean W Graham; Sarah Mathews; Michael Melkonian; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Nicholas W Miles; Carl J Rothfels; Lisa Pokorny; A Jonathan Shaw; Lisa DeGironimo; Dennis W Stevenson; Barbara Surek; Juan Carlos Villarreal; Béatrice Roure; Hervé Philippe; Claude W dePamphilis; Tao Chen; Michael K Deyholos; Regina S Baucom; Toni M Kutchan; Megan M Augustin; Jun Wang; Yong Zhang; Zhijian Tian; Zhixiang Yan; Xiaolei Wu; Xiao Sun; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; James Leebens-Mack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The future of evolutionary diversity in reef corals.

Authors:  Danwei Huang; Kaustuv Roy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.

Authors:  Eliran Avni; Zahi Yona; Reuven Cohen; Sagi Snir
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Reconstructing a SuperGeneTree minimizing reconciliation.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Aïda Ouangraoua; Nadia El-Mabrouk
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  DACTAL: divide-and-conquer trees (almost) without alignments.

Authors:  Serita Nelesen; Kevin Liu; Li-San Wang; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods.

Authors:  Nam Nguyen; Siavash Mirarab; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  Extracting conflict-free information from multi-labeled trees.

Authors:  Akshay Deepak; David Fernández-Baca; Michelle M McMahon
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.

Authors:  Christopher Whidden; Norbert Zeh; Robert G Beiko
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.