Literature DB >> 26451911

Reconstructing a SuperGeneTree minimizing reconciliation.

Manuel Lafond, Aïda Ouangraoua, Nadia El-Mabrouk.   

Abstract

Combining a set of trees on partial datasets into a single tree is a classical method for inferring large phylogenetic trees. Ideally, the combined tree should display each input partial tree, which is only possible if input trees do not contain contradictory phylogenetic information. The simplest version of the supertree problem is thus to state whether a set of trees is compatible, and if so, construct a tree displaying them all. Classically, supertree methods have been applied to the reconstruction of species trees. Here we rather consider reconstructing a super gene tree in light of a known species tree S. We define the supergenetree problem as finding, among all supertrees displaying a set of input gene trees, one supertree minimizing a reconciliation distance with S. We first show how classical exact methods to the supertree problem can be extended to the supergenetree problem. As all these methods are highly exponential, we also exhibit a natural greedy heuristic for the duplication cost, based on minimizing the set of duplications preceding the first speciation event. We then show that both the supergenetree problem and its restriction to minimizing duplications preceding the first speciation are NP-hard to approximate within a n1-ϵ factor, for any 0 < ϵ < 1. Finally, we show that a restriction of this problem to uniquely labeled speciation gene trees, which is relevant to many biological applications, is also NP-hard. Therefore, we introduce new avenues in the field of supertrees, and set the theoretical basis for the exploration of various algorithmic aspects of the problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451911      PMCID: PMC4602317          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S14-S4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  18 in total

1.  Majority-rule supertrees.

Authors:  James A Cotton; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.

Authors:  Vincent Ranwez; Vincent Berry; Alexis Criscuolo; Pierre-Henri Fabre; Sylvain Guillemot; Celine Scornavacca; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Lechner; Sven Findeiss; Lydia Steiner; Manja Marz; Peter F Stadler; Sonja J Prohaska
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  MetaPhOrs: orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score.

Authors:  Leszek P Pryszcz; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods.

Authors:  Nam Nguyen; Siavash Mirarab; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Databases of homologous gene families for comparative genomics.

Authors:  Simon Penel; Anne-Muriel Arigon; Jean-François Dufayard; Anne-Sophie Sertier; Vincent Daubin; Laurent Duret; Manolo Gouy; Guy Perrière
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Berkeley PHOG: PhyloFacts orthology group prediction web server.

Authors:  Ruchira S Datta; Christopher Meacham; Bushra Samad; Christoph Neyer; Kimmen Sjölander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Berglund; Erik Sjölund; Gabriel Ostlund; Erik L L Sonnhammer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inferring duplication episodes from unrooted gene trees.

Authors:  Jarosław Paszek; Paweł Górecki
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.