Literature DB >> 21930615

Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals?

Souhila Messaoud-Galusi1, Valerie Hazan, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The claim that speech perception abilities are impaired in dyslexia was investigated in a group of 62 children with dyslexia and 51 average readers matched in age.
METHOD: To test whether there was robust evidence of speech perception deficits in children with dyslexia, speech perception in noise and quiet was measured using 8 different tasks involving the identification and discrimination of a complex and highly natural synthetic "bee"-"pea" contrast (copy synthesized from natural models) and the perception of naturally produced words.
RESULTS: Children with dyslexia, on average, performed more poorly than did average readers in the synthetic syllables identification task in quiet and in across-category discrimination (but not when tested using an adaptive procedure). They did not differ from average readers on 2 tasks of word recognition in noise or identification of synthetic syllables in noise. For all tasks, a majority of individual children with dyslexia performed within norms. Finally, speech perception generally did not correlate with pseudoword reading or phonological processing--the core skills related to dyslexia.
CONCLUSIONS: On the tasks and speech stimuli that the authors used, most children with dyslexia did not appear to show a consistent deficit in speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930615      PMCID: PMC3374927          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/09-0261)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  46 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Think before you speak: pauses, memory search, and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span.

Authors:  C Hulme; P Newton; N Cowan; G Stuart; G Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The relationship between paired associate learning and phonological skills in normally developing readers.

Authors:  K L Windfuhr; M J Snowling
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2001-10

4.  Speech perception, lexicality, and reading skill.

Authors:  P Chiappe; D L Chiappe; L S Siegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2001-09

5.  Double dissociations in developmental disorders? Theoretically misconceived, empirically dubious.

Authors:  Annette Karmiloff-Smith; Gaia Scerif; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children.

Authors:  J F Werker; R C Tees
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-03

7.  Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis.

Authors:  M Snowling; N Goulandris; M Bowlby; P Howell
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1986-06

8.  In search of the auditory, phonetic, and/or phonological problems in dyslexia: context effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Leo Blomert; Holger Mitterer; Christiaan Paffen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

10.  Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls.

Authors:  C Bogliotti; W Serniclaes; S Messaoud-Galusi; L Sprenger-Charolles
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-05-06
View more
  25 in total

1.  Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.

Authors:  Travis White-Schwoch; Evan C Davies; Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Trent Nicol; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effect of talker and intonation variability on speech perception in noise in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Souhila Messaoud-Galusi; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Plasticity in auditory categorization is supported by differential engagement of the auditory-linguistic network.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Breya Walker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Emergent literacy in kindergartners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Christopher Holloman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech.

Authors:  Dana Boebinger; Samuel Evans; Stuart Rosen; César F Lima; Tom Manly; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.