Literature DB >> 21928922

On the relationship between memory and perception: sequential dependencies in recognition memory testing.

Kenneth J Malmberg1, Jeffrey Annis.   

Abstract

Many models of recognition are derived from models originally applied to perception tasks, which assume that decisions from trial to trial are independent. While the independence assumption is violated for many perception tasks, we present the results of several experiments intended to relate memory and perception by exploring sequential dependencies in recognition. The findings from these experiments disconfirm the independence assumption for recognition memory. In addition, the pattern of sequential dependencies observed in recognition differs from that observed for many perception tasks. This suggests that sequential dependencies arise from mnemonic or perceptual processes and not from decision processes that should be common to memory and perception tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928922     DOI: 10.1037/a0025277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  12 in total

1.  Sequential dependencies in recall of sequences: filling in the blanks.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Mark J Hurlstone; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

2.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

3.  The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

4.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Modeling mean estimation tasks in within-trial and across-trial contexts.

Authors:  Ke Tong; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Unexpected novelty and familiarity orienting responses in lateral parietal cortex during recognition judgment.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Alex Konkel; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan G Tullis; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Angela M Pazzaglia; Caren M Rotello; Michael J Hautus; Neil A Macmillan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Age differences in cross-task bleeding.

Authors:  Jessica Nicosia; David Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.