Literature DB >> 21927873

Architecture and microstructure of cortical bone in reconstructed canine mandibles after bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Uriel Zapata1, Emily K Halvachs, Paul C Dechow, Mohammed E Elsalanty, Lynne A Opperman.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of the canine mandible using bone transport distraction osteogenesis has been shown to be a suitable method for correcting segmental bone defects produced by cancer, gunshots, and trauma. Although the mechanical quality of the new regenerate cortical bone seems to be related to the mineralization process, several questions regarding the microstructural patterns of the new bony tissue remain unanswered. The purpose of this study was to quantify any microstructural differences that may exist between the regenerate and control cortical bone. Five adult American foxhound dogs underwent unilateral bone transport distraction of the mandible to repair bone defects of 30-35 mm. Animals were killed 12 weeks after the beginning of the consolidation period. Fourteen cylindrical cortical samples were extracted from the superior, medial, and inferior aspects of the lingual and buccal plates of the reconstructed aspect of the mandible, and 21 specimens were collected similarly from the contralateral aspect of the mandible. Specimens were evaluated using histomorphometric and micro-computed tomographic techniques to compare their microstructure. Except for differences in haversian canal area, histomorphometric analyses suggested no statistical differences in microstructure between regenerate and control cortical bone. Morphological evaluation suggested a consistent level of anisotropy, possibly related to the distraction vector. After 12 weeks' consolidation, bone created during bone transport distraction osteogenesis was comparable to native bone in microstructure, architecture, and mechanical properties. It is proposed that, after enough time, the properties of the regenerate bone will be identical to that of native bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927873      PMCID: PMC3207503          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-011-9529-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  33 in total

1.  Elastic anisotropy and collagen orientation of osteonal bone are dependent on the mechanical strain distribution.

Authors:  Y Takano; C H Turner; I Owan; R B Martin; S T Lau; M R Forwood; D B Burr
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Microscopic evaluation of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Ismet Duran; Siddik Malkoç; Haluk Işeri; Mustafa Tunali; Murat Tosun; Hasan Küçükkolbaşi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Experimental study of mineralization in mandibular bone distraction with irradiation during the consolidation phase.

Authors:  Angélique Girod; Thierry Roger; Pierre Breton; Pierre Bouletreau
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.

Authors:  C E Zimmermann; P Thurmüller; M J Troulis; D H Perrott; B Rahn; L B Kaban
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.

Authors:  J G McCarthy; J Schreiber; N Karp; C H Thorne; B H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Microstructural and strength evaluation of regenerate tissue during the consolidation period after vertical mandibular ramus distraction.

Authors:  David F Gomez; Eduardo F Sant'Anna; Robert M Leven; Sjdran A Ostric; Alvaro A Figueroa; Thomas J Royston; Dale R Sumner; John W Polley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Spatial organization of the haversian bone in man.

Authors:  M Petrtýl; J Hert; P Fiala
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Craniofacial development and growth in the dog.

Authors:  P R Hennet; C E Harvey
Journal:  J Vet Dent       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 0.857

10.  Mechanical properties of buccal compact bone of the mandibular ramus in human adults and children: relationship of the elastic modulus to the direction of the osteon and the porosity ratio.

Authors:  T Hara; M Takizawa; T Sato; Y Ide
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  1998-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Transport distraction osteogenesis for maxillomandibular reconstruction: current concepts and applications.

Authors:  R S Neelakandan; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

2.  Biomechanics of the canine mandible during bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Ikuya Watanabe; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve regeneration by bifocal distraction osteogenesis with retrograde transportation of horseradish peroxidase in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Shogen; Emiko Tanaka Isomura; Mikihiko Kogo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.