INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at assessing the effect of radiotherapy on regenerated bone mineralization and consolidation obtained by mandibular bone distraction. The planned application was a new immediate mandibular reconstruction technique in defects following surgery for oral cavity tumours requiring postoperative radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten sheep underwent bilateral mandibular bone distraction (control group). A second group of 6 sheep (study group) had bilateral mandibular bone distraction followed by irradiation on the 21st postoperative day. The animals were sacrificed on the 60th postoperative day. Radiographic and histomorphometric studies were performed. RESULTS: In the control group, 9 distraction sites out of 20 were consolidated. In the irradiated group, 9 out of 12 were consolidated. Histomorphometric analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the osseous and cartilaginous samples, the trabecular thickness of the new bone, or the osteoid surface of basal bone in the control and test groups (p=0.126, 0.247, 0.792, 0.082). However, the osteoid surface of the regenerated bone in the test group was statistically smaller (p=0.017) than in the control group. CONCLUSION: In this experiment, radiotherapy did not hinder bone mineralization or consolidation following distraction of mandibular bone receiving irradiation on the 21st postoperative day. Bone distraction could be proposed for the repair of mandibular defects following surgery for oral tumours which require early postoperative radiotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at assessing the effect of radiotherapy on regenerated bone mineralization and consolidation obtained by mandibular bone distraction. The planned application was a new immediate mandibular reconstruction technique in defects following surgery for oral cavity tumours requiring postoperative radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten sheep underwent bilateral mandibular bone distraction (control group). A second group of 6 sheep (study group) had bilateral mandibular bone distraction followed by irradiation on the 21st postoperative day. The animals were sacrificed on the 60th postoperative day. Radiographic and histomorphometric studies were performed. RESULTS: In the control group, 9 distraction sites out of 20 were consolidated. In the irradiated group, 9 out of 12 were consolidated. Histomorphometric analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the osseous and cartilaginous samples, the trabecular thickness of the new bone, or the osteoid surface of basal bone in the control and test groups (p=0.126, 0.247, 0.792, 0.082). However, the osteoid surface of the regenerated bone in the test group was statistically smaller (p=0.017) than in the control group. CONCLUSION: In this experiment, radiotherapy did not hinder bone mineralization or consolidation following distraction of mandibular bone receiving irradiation on the 21st postoperative day. Bone distraction could be proposed for the repair of mandibular defects following surgery for oral tumours which require early postoperative radiotherapy.
Authors: Uriel Zapata; Emily K Halvachs; Paul C Dechow; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Lynne A Opperman Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 4.333