Literature DB >> 24061532

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Nicola L Robertson1, Mark Emberton, Caroline M Moore.   

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is of interest for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer and mpMRI-targeted biopsies are being used increasingly in clinical practice. Target acquisition is performed using a range of magnet strengths and varying combinations of anatomical and functional sequences. Target identification at the time of biopsy can be carried out in the MRI scanner (in-bore biopsy) or, more commonly, the MRI-target is biopsied under ultrasonographic guidance. Many groups use cognitive or visual registration, whereby the biopsy target is identified on MRI and ultrasonography is subsequently used to direct the needle to the same location. Other groups use registration software to show prebiopsy MRI data on real-time ultrasonography. The reporting of histological results in MRI-targeted biopsy studies varies greatly. The most useful reports compare the detection of clinically significant disease in standard cores versus mpMRI-targeted cores in the same cohort of men, as recommended by the STAndards of Reporting for MRI-Targeted biopsy studies (START) consensus panel. Further evidence is needed before an mpMRI-targeted strategy can be recommended as the standard intervention for men at risk of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061532     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  72 in total

1.  Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Scott Eggener; Mark Emberton; Jurgen J Fütterer; Inderbir S Gill; Robert L Grubb Iii; Boris Hadaschik; Laurence Klotz; Daniel J A Margolis; Leonard S Marks; Jonathan Melamed; Aytekin Oto; Suzanne L Palmer; Peter Pinto; Philippe Puech; Shonit Punwani; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ivo G Schoots; Richard Simon; Samir S Taneja; Baris Turkbey; Osamu Ukimura; Jan van der Meulen; Arnauld Villers; Yuji Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Henkjan J Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Is it possible to model the risk of malignancy of focal abnormalities found at prostate multiparametric MRI?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Matthieu Papillard; Nicolas Girouin; Romain Boutier; Muriel Rabilloud; Benjamin Riche; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Real-time Virtual Sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Tomoaki Miyagawa; Satoru Ishikawa; Tomokazu Kimura; Takahiro Suetomi; Masakazu Tsutsumi; Toshiyuki Irie; Masanao Kondoh; Tsuyoshi Mitake
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three Tesla before rebiopsy.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Moo Lee; Chan Kyo Kim; Han Yong Choi; Jong Wook Park
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.

Authors:  S Cirillo; M Petracchini; P Della Monica; T Gallo; V Tartaglia; E Vestita; U Ferrando; D Regge
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timur H Kuru; Matthias C Roethke; Jonas Seidenader; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Silvan Boxler; Khalid Alammar; Philip Rieker; Valentin I Popeneciu; Wilfried Roth; Sascha Pahernik; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate cancer detection using an extended prostate biopsy schema in combination with additional targeted cores from suspicious images in conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  A P Labanaris; K Engelhard; V Zugor; R Nützel; R Kühn
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Philippe Puech; Olivier Rouvière; Raphaele Renard-Penna; Arnauld Villers; Patrick Devos; Marc Colombel; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Xavier Leroy; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Eva Comperat; Adil Ouzzane; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Rouse; Greg Shaw; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prostate interdisciplinary communication and mapping algorithm for biopsy and pathology (PIC-MABP) of multiparametric MRI findings.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Daniel Junker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Prognostic Utility of PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-01-22

4.  The impact of African American race on prostate cancer detection on repeat prostate biopsy in a veteran population.

Authors:  William A Sterling; Joseph Weiner; David Schreiber; Komal Mehta; Jeffrey P Weiss
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Morand Piert; Jeffrey Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Virginia Rogers; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran; Timothy D Johnson; Xia Shao; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Investigating the ability of multiparametric MRI to exclude significant prostate cancer prior to transperineal biopsy.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Tristan Barrett; Karan Wadhwa; Deepak Parashar; Julia Frey; Brendan C Koo; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Christof Kastner; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Carmen Maccagnano; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

9.  Evaluation of the 'Prostate Interdisciplinary Communication and Mapping Algorithm for Biopsy and Pathology' (PIC-MABP).

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Thomas R W Herrmann; Markus Bader; Jasmin Bektic; Gregor Henkel; Stephan Kruck; Markus Sandbichler; David Schilling; Georg Schäfer; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Management at Initial Staging and Time of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Jason Bailey; Morand Piert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.