Literature DB >> 21926910

Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty: 5-year follow-up from the corneal transplant epidemiological study.

Adriano Fasolo1, Cristina Capuzzo, Michela Fornea, Antonella Franch, Federica Birattari, Giuseppe Carito, Flavio Cucco, Giovanni Prosdocimo, Michele Sala, Nicola Delle Noci, Vito Primavera, Anna Chiara Frigo, Francesco Grigoletto, Diego Ponzin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal graft survival over a 5-year period and to investigate whether factors related to the donor, eye bank practices, the recipient, surgery, and postoperative course influenced the outcome.
METHODS: Nine hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly selected and monitored in the subsequent 3 years from a cohort of 4500 recipients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty between 2001 and 2004. Cox univariate regression analysis was used to select variables to be included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with a backward selection procedure to identify potential risk factors for graft failure. Graft survival curves were obtained from Kaplan-Meier estimates.
RESULTS: Ectasia/thinning was the most common indication (49.1%), followed by regraft (16.1%) and pseudophakic corneal edema (PCE) (9.4%). The overall rate of graft failure was 10.7% with 6 cases of primary graft failure. Adverse reactions and complications (other than graft failure) were reported in 2.7% of patients in the first postoperative week and in 22.8% during the full follow-up period. The probability of 5-year survival was 83.0%, best in eyes with ectasia/thinning (96.0%) and less favorable in PCE (67.0%) and regraft (64.0%). Multivariate analyses showed the following variables to be linked to an increased risk of graft failure: regraft for any reason, all clinical indication except PCE, history of ocular inflammation/infection, pseudophakic/aphakic eye, vitrectomy, graft Descemet folds, adverse reactions/complications, and surgeons' low caseload.
CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating keratoplasty shows an overall positive prognosis in the long-term. However, the probability of graft survival is largely dependent on the preoperative clinical condition and the lack of complications during follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926910     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318206895a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  24 in total

1.  Refractive outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in fellow eyes for keratoconus.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Mattia Passilongo; Adriano Fasolo; Sara Ficial; Stefano Ferrari; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Corneal graft rejection 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Steven P Dunn; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Christopher L Blanton; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Kenneth R Kenyon; Mark J Mannis; Shahzad I Mian; Christopher J Rapuano; Walter J Stark; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Corneal allograft reaction associated with nonocular inflammation.

Authors:  Gargi Khare Vora; Joseph B Ciolino
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-07

4.  Ocular surface rehabilitation: Application of human amniotic membrane in high-risk penetrating keratoplasties.

Authors:  Pho Nguyen; Kelly Rue; Martin Heur; Samuel C Yiu
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-02

5.  Mechanism of immune tolerance induced by donor derived immature dendritic cells in rat high-risk corneal transplantation.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Gao; Yan Fu; Wen-Jing Li; An-Jie Du; Xia Li; Xu-Dong Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Indications and graft survival analysis in optical penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary care center in North India: a 5-year study.

Authors:  Sudesh Kumar Arya; Amit Raj; Ravi Kant Bamotra; Anubha Bhatti; Jyoti Deswal; Meenakshi Sindhu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 7.  Indications, surgical procedures and outcomes of keratoplasty at a Tertiary University-based hospital: a review of 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Eman M Al-Sharif; Majed Alkharashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Cornea Procurement and Processing up to 72 Hours: No Risk for Cornea Transplant Quality.

Authors:  Nicola Hofmann; Ilka Wittmershaus; Anna-Katharina Salz; Martin Börgel
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Health status and patient satisfaction after corneal graft: results from the corneal transplant epidemiological study.

Authors:  Adriano Fasolo; Cristina Capuzzo; Michela Fornea; Anna Chiara Frigo; Cristina Monterosso; Alfonso Zampini; Antonio Avarello; Alessandro Galan; Sandro Sbordone; Adele Elisabetta Ragucci; Claudio Gorla; Francesco Grigoletto; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Outcome of corneal transplantation in a private institution in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nazri Omar; Charbel T Bou Chacra; Khalid F Tabbara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.