Literature DB >> 25278797

Ocular surface rehabilitation: Application of human amniotic membrane in high-risk penetrating keratoplasties.

Pho Nguyen1, Kelly Rue1, Martin Heur1, Samuel C Yiu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human amniotic membrane is a versatile tool for management of ocular surface disorders. This study evaluates the effect of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane (hAM) on one-year survival of penetrating keratoplasties (PKP) in high-risk recipients.
METHOD: This is a retrospective noncomparative cohort study of 58 consecutive eyes undergoing PKP with concurrent placement of a self-retained cryopreserved hAM (PROKERA®) at a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2010.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 66.7 ± 17.2 years and 30 (54%) were males. 51 eyes were pseudophakic and one aphakic. 27 eyes were glaucomatous; 24 had glaucoma drainage device and 2 had previous endocyclophotocoagulation. 12 patients had PKP for the first time and 46 had repeat PKP (average number of prior PKP = 1.63 ± 1.1, range: 1-5). Risk factors for graft failure included repeat PKP (79.3%), corneal neovascularization (51.7%), preexisting glaucoma (46.6%), and presence of anterior synechiae (37.9%). Both First Transplant and Repeat Transplant groups had similar survival rates until 6 months after transplant (75% vs 74%, odds ratio = 1.06, p = 1.00). At 12 months, First Transplant group showed a better survival rate (67% vs 43%, odds ratio = 2.60, p = 0.20). Eyes with >3 risk factors had a higher graft failure rate (odds ratio = 5.81, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Survey of the literature suggests that high-risk PKP with concurrent hAM placement demonstrate comparable graft survival. Presence of multiple risk factors is associated with poor survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniotic membrane; Anti-angiogenesis; Graft rejection; Immunomodulation; Penetrating keratoplasty; ProKera

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278797      PMCID: PMC4181454          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1319-4534


  52 in total

Review 1.  Ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial stem cells: amniotic membrane serving as a stem cell niche.

Authors:  Martin Grueterich; Edgar M Espana; Scheffer C G Tseng
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Third or greater penetrating keratoplasties: indications, survival, and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Elvin H Yildiz; Eliza Hoskins; Nicole Fram; Christopher J Rapuano; Kristin M Hammersmith; Peter R Laibson; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Ocular surface reconstruction: recent advances and future outlook.

Authors:  Samuel C Yiu; Padmaja B Thomas; Pho Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Corneal neovascularization as a risk factor for graft failure and rejection after keratoplasty: an evidence-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bjorn Bachmann; Rod S Taylor; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Ex vivo expansion of corneal stem cells on amniotic membrane and their outcome.

Authors:  Ray Jui-Fang Tsai; Ryan Yao-Nien Tsai
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

Authors:  M G Maguire; W J Stark; J D Gottsch; R D Stulting; A Sugar; N E Fink; A Schwartz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Jean Paul Tanner; Mariya Dontchev; Brad Tennant; Robert L Schultze; Steven P Dunn; Thomas D Lindquist; Robin L Gal; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J J Ing; H H Ing; L R Nelson; D O Hodge; W M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Pharmacologic strategies in the prevention and treatment of corneal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Khalid F Tabbara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Dry eye and ocular surface disease.

Authors:  Samuel C Yiu
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07

2.  Accelerated Restoration of Ocular Surface Health in Dry Eye Disease by Self-Retained Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane.

Authors:  Anny M S Cheng; Dandan Zhao; Rendian Chen; Han Y Yin; Sean Tighe; Hosam Sheha; Victoria Casas; Scheffer C G Tseng
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Sustained release of decorin to the surface of the eye enables scarless corneal regeneration.

Authors:  Lisa J Hill; Richard J A Moakes; Chairut Vareechon; Gibran Butt; Aaron Ng; Kristian Brock; Gurpreet Chouhan; Rachel C Vincent; Serena Abbondante; Richard L Williams; Nicholas M Barnes; Eric Pearlman; Graham R Wallace; Saaeha Rauz; Ann Logan; Liam M Grover
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2018-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.