Literature DB >> 27638316

Refractive outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in fellow eyes for keratoconus.

Emilio Pedrotti1, Mattia Passilongo2, Adriano Fasolo3, Sara Ficial1, Stefano Ferrari3, Giorgio Marchini1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive outcomes following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in fellow eyes in patients with keratoconus.
METHODS: This is an observational retrospective review of consecutive patients with keratoconus first managed with penetrating keratoplasty in one eye and then with lamellar keratoplasty in the fellow eye, between 2002 and 2007. Data collection was based on patients' hospital records. Information related to assessment before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after keratoplasty were retrieved and considered in the analysis. Clinical evaluations included patients' medical histories and diagnosis of keratoconus, uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, refractive cylinder, topographic cylinder, and high-order aberrations, complications, and adverse reactions. Data on contrast sensitivity, central corneal thickness, and central residual bed thickness (only for lamellar keratoplasty) were retrieved from anterior segment optical coherence tomography observation performed at 48 months.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (32 eyes), 7 males and 9 females, were included in the analyses. After 4 years from transplantation, at the end of follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found in visual acuity and refractive measures between the two keratoplasties. Perforating keratoplasty showed significant differences for contrast sensitivity at 6 cpd with maximum glare (p = 0.026) and without glare (p = 0.015). Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty showed a negative correlation between central residual bed thickness and best corrected visual acuity (R = -0.414, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The manual pre-descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty used in this study showed refractive and visual results comparable to those obtained with penetrating keratoplasty. Such results indicated that leaving healthy stroma attached to Descemet's membrane does not compromise the clinical outcome in the short and long term after surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; Fellow eyes; Keratoconus; Penetrating keratoplasty; Retrospective study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27638316     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0350-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  21 in total

1.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a long-term review of results and complications.

Authors:  R J Olson; M Pingree; R Ridges; M L Lundergan; C Alldredge; T E Clinch
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Authors:  C L Funnell; J Ball; B A Noble
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts.

Authors:  Navid Ardjomand; Scott Hau; James C McAlister; Catey Bunce; David Galaretta; Stephen J Tuft; Daniel F P Larkin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Sathish Srinivasan; Jin Ya-Ping; Allan R Slomovic; David S Rootman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  [Contrast sensitivity in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  Carlos Anchieta Castro Cardoso da Silva; Ederson Schweitzer de Oliveira; Manoel Paulo Souza de Sena Júnior; Luciene Barbosa de Souza
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.872

6.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty by intracorneal dissection: a prospective clinical and confocal microscopic study.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchini; Leonardo Mastropasqua; Emilio Pedrotti; Mario Nubile; Marco Ciancaglini; Arianna Sbabo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK): visual outcome and complications for a heterogeneous group of corneal pathologies.

Authors:  Bruce A Noble; Ashish Agrawal; Cian Collins; Manuel Saldana; Paul R Brogden; Bruno Zuberbuhler
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Indications and outcome of optical partial thickness lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jagjit S Saini; Arun K Jain; Jaspreet Sukhija; Vandana Saroha
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Javadi; Sepehr Feizi; Shahin Yazdani; Firooz Mirbabaee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Yihui Chen; Peng Wang; Bing Li; Weifang Wang; Yan Su; Minjie Sheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Majid Shams; Ali Sharifi; Zahra Akbari; Ali Maghsoudlou; Mohammad Reza Tajali
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.