OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of use for mannitol and hypertonic saline in children with traumatic brain injury, to evaluate any potential associations between hypertonic saline and mannitol use and patient demographic, injury, and treatment hospital characteristics, and to determine whether the 2003 guidelines for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury impacted clinical practice regarding osmolar therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric Health Information System database, January, 2001 to December, 2008. PATIENTS: Children (age <18 yrs) with traumatic brain injury and head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3 who received mechanical ventilation and intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: : None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital billing for parenteral hypertonic saline and mannitol use, by day of service. Overall, 33% (2,069 of 6,238) of the patients received hypertonic saline, and 40% (2,500 of 6,238) received mannitol. Of the 1,854 patients who received hypertonic saline or mannitol for ≥ 2 days in the first week of therapy, 29% did not have intracranial pressure monitoring. After adjustment for hospital-level variation, primary insurance payer, and overall injury severity, use of both drugs was independently associated with older patient age, intracranial hemorrhage (other than epidural), skull fracture, and higher head/neck injury severity. Hypertonic saline use increased and mannitol use decreased with publication of the 2003 guidelines, and these trends continued through 2008. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertonic saline and mannitol are used less in infants than in older children. The patient-level and hospital-level variation in osmolar therapy use and the substantial amount of sustained osmolar therapy without intracranial pressure monitoring suggest opportunities to improve the quality of pediatric traumatic brain injury care. With limited high-quality evidence available, published expert guidelines appear to significantly impact clinical practice in this area.
OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of use for mannitol and hypertonic saline in children with traumatic brain injury, to evaluate any potential associations between hypertonic saline and mannitol use and patient demographic, injury, and treatment hospital characteristics, and to determine whether the 2003 guidelines for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury impacted clinical practice regarding osmolar therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric Health Information System database, January, 2001 to December, 2008. PATIENTS: Children (age <18 yrs) with traumatic brain injury and head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3 who received mechanical ventilation and intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: : None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital billing for parenteral hypertonicsaline and mannitol use, by day of service. Overall, 33% (2,069 of 6,238) of the patients received hypertonic saline, and 40% (2,500 of 6,238) received mannitol. Of the 1,854 patients who received hypertonic saline or mannitol for ≥ 2 days in the first week of therapy, 29% did not have intracranial pressure monitoring. After adjustment for hospital-level variation, primary insurance payer, and overall injury severity, use of both drugs was independently associated with older patient age, intracranial hemorrhage (other than epidural), skull fracture, and higher head/neck injury severity. Hypertonic saline use increased and mannitol use decreased with publication of the 2003 guidelines, and these trends continued through 2008. CONCLUSIONS:Hypertonic saline and mannitol are used less in infants than in older children. The patient-level and hospital-level variation in osmolar therapy use and the substantial amount of sustained osmolar therapy without intracranial pressure monitoring suggest opportunities to improve the quality of pediatric traumatic brain injury care. With limited high-quality evidence available, published expert guidelines appear to significantly impact clinical practice in this area.
Authors: Kevin P Morris; Robert J Forsyth; Roger C Parslow; Robert C Tasker; Carol A Hawley Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-07-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sarah C Ducrocq; Philippe G Meyer; Gilles A Orliaguet; Stéphane Blanot; Anne Laurent-Vannier; Dominique Renier; Pierre A Carli Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Joanne N Wood; Matthew Hall; Samantha Schilling; Ron Keren; Nandita Mitra; David M Rubin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Pamela F Weiss; Andrew J Klink; Kari Hexem; Jon M Burnham; Mary B Leonard; Ron Keren; Russell Localio; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Christopher M Ruzas; Peter E DeWitt; Kimberly S Bennett; Kevin E Chapman; Nicole Harlaar; Tellen D Bennett Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Brian F Flaherty; Margaret L Jackson; Charles S Cox; Amy Clark; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Richard Holubkov; Kevin R Moore; Rajan P Patel; Heather T Keenan Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Tellen D Bennett; Susan L Bratton; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Eric R Scaife; Michael L Nance; Jeffrey S Prince; Jacob Wilkes; Heather T Keenan Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Tellen D Bennett; Christian M Niedzwecki; E Kent Korgenski; Susan L Bratton Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 3.966