OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and to establish which ICP-targetted therapies are being used in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United Kingdom. To evaluate current practice against recently published guidelines. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective data collection of clinical and demographic information from paediatric and adult intensive care units in the UK and Ireland admitting children (< 16 years) with TBI between February 2001 and August 2003. RESULTS: Detailed clinical information was obtained for 501 children, with information on the use of ICP monitoring available in 445. ICP monitoring was used in only 59% (75/127) of children presenting with an emergency room Glasgow Coma Scale of 8 or below. Large between centre variation was seen in the use of ICP monitoring, independent of severity of injury. There were 86 children who received ICP-targetted therapies without ICP monitoring. Wide between centre variation was found in the use of ICP-targetted therapies and in general aspects of management, such as fluid restriction, the use of muscle relaxants and prophylactic anticonvulsants. Intra-ventricular catheters are rarely placed (6% of cases); therefore cerebrospinal fluid drainage is seldom used as a first-line therapy for raised ICP. Jugular venous bulb oximetry (4%), brain microdialysis (< 1%) and brain tissue oxygen monitoring (< 1%) are rarely used in current practice. Contrary to published guidelines, moderate to severe hyperventilation is being used without monitoring for cerebral ischaemia. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for greater standardisation of practice across UK centres admitting children with severe TBI.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and to establish which ICP-targetted therapies are being used in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United Kingdom. To evaluate current practice against recently published guidelines. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective data collection of clinical and demographic information from paediatric and adult intensive care units in the UK and Ireland admitting children (< 16 years) with TBI between February 2001 and August 2003. RESULTS: Detailed clinical information was obtained for 501 children, with information on the use of ICP monitoring available in 445. ICP monitoring was used in only 59% (75/127) of children presenting with an emergency room Glasgow Coma Scale of 8 or below. Large between centre variation was seen in the use of ICP monitoring, independent of severity of injury. There were 86 children who received ICP-targetted therapies without ICP monitoring. Wide between centre variation was found in the use of ICP-targetted therapies and in general aspects of management, such as fluid restriction, the use of muscle relaxants and prophylactic anticonvulsants. Intra-ventricular catheters are rarely placed (6% of cases); therefore cerebrospinal fluid drainage is seldom used as a first-line therapy for raised ICP. Jugular venous bulb oximetry (4%), brain microdialysis (< 1%) and brain tissue oxygen monitoring (< 1%) are rarely used in current practice. Contrary to published guidelines, moderate to severe hyperventilation is being used without monitoring for cerebral ischaemia. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for greater standardisation of practice across UK centres admitting children with severe TBI.
Authors: A Taylor; W Butt; J Rosenfeld; F Shann; M Ditchfield; E Lewis; G Klug; D Wallace; R Henning; J Tibballs Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: G D Murray; G M Teasdale; R Braakman; F Cohadon; M Dearden; F Iannotti; A Karimi; F Lapierre; A Maas; J Ohman; L Persson; F Servadei; N Stocchetti; T Trojanowski; A Unterberg Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 1999 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: J M Tilford; P M Simpson; T S Yeh; S Lensing; M E Aitken; J W Green; J Harr; D H Fiser Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Eileen M Bulger; Avery B Nathens; Frederick P Rivara; Maria Moore; Ellen J MacKenzie; Gregory J Jurkovich Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: P David Adelson; Susan L Bratton; Nancy A Carney; Randall M Chesnut; Hugo E M du Coudray; Brahm Goldstein; Patrick M Kochanek; Helen C Miller; Michael D Partington; Nathan R Selden; Craig R Warden; David W Wright Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Riccardo Lubrano; Marco Elli; Francesca Stoppa; Mario Di Traglia; Matteo Di Nardo; Daniela Perrotta; Piero David; Sara Paoli; Corrado Cecchetti Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Daniel De Backer; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerôme Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Anthony A Figaji; Eugene Zwane; Crispin Thompson; A Graham Fieggen; Andrew C Argent; Peter D Le Roux; Jonathan C Peter Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 1.475